Why does there seem to be a stigma attached to advocate for Men's Rights?

djchameleon · 05-03-2017, 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Man like Monkey

Why are you incapable of acknowledging the lack of consent? Every time we discuss this you basically tell us that you're OK with it therefore everyone else should be too and if they're not then **** them.

The reason people have an issue with non medical infant circumcision is because the person in question has no say in what happens to their own body.

Do you think people should be given the choice?

Lack of consent? By the time they can consent that makes the procedure even riskier. The parents are the legal guardians so they are able to give consent.

~~Cuthbert~~ · 05-03-2017, 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon

Lack of consent? By the time they can consent that makes the procedure even riskier. The parents are the legal guardians so they are able to give consent.

The process (non medical infant circumcision) is unnecessary anyway. Foreskin can't be brought back but can always be removed if the individual wishes to have a circumcision out of their own free will in the future, therefore stopping it and allowing them to have the choice is the correct decision.

IMO.

djchameleon · 05-03-2017, 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Man like Monkey

The process (non medical infant circumcision) is unnecessary anyway. Foreskin can't be brought back but can always be removed if the individual wishes to have a circumcision out of their own free will in the future, therefore stopping it and allowing them to have the choice is the correct decision.

IMO.

Removing the skin later on like I said is what leads to those circumcision horror stories that people on your side like to wave around as mutilation and brutality. Come off it.

It is better to be done as an infant and is in no way comparable to female circumcision.

~~Cuthbert~~ · 05-03-2017, 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon

Removing the skin later on like I said is what leads to those circumcision horror stories that people on your side like to wave around as mutilation and brutality. Come off it.

It might not need to be removed at all, so that would be something the individual is able to think about and then decide if they want to proceed with the circumcision. But at present they are not able to decide but may want to keep their foreskin.

Quote:

It is better to be done as an infant and is in no way comparable to female circumcision.

I did not compare it to anything. You've just done that.

DwnWthVwls · 05-03-2017, 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon

Lack of consent? By the time they can consent that makes the procedure even riskier. The parents are the legal guardians so they are able to give consent.

Guardians dont have control of cosmetic procedures. Can a parent force there 8 yr old to get circumcised once he has a voice to to say no youre not cutting my dick? If your baby comes out with a nose you dont like are you going to have that "fixed" too? Where do you draw the line? Or is it just okay for dicks because tradition?