Kind of similar to the "well I was beaten as a kid and I turned out fine" in that you have zero chance of knowing how different you would be if you weren't beaten/circumcised.

I'll never be able to spacedock.. I deserve the opportunity to make that decision.

Little strip of duct tape?

This is so way beyond dramatic. I'm glad I took my ass to bed instead of indulging in this Tom Foolery.

:clap: Yeah exactly.

It's not the same... :(

Doesn't circumcision take away a certain part of sexual pleasure due to losing sensitivity?
Seems like a ****ed up thing to do to one's child.

Based on nearly every study I've read, no. It's a myth.

Is it? You definitely lose nerve endings and sensitivity.

Does Circumcision Reduce Sexual Pleasure?

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...al-sensitivity

It's official: Circumcision DOESN'T affect sexual pleasure, according to biggest ever study of the issue | Daily Mail Online

Hmm not sure about either study tbh. Most people don't have a frame of reference of what the other side is like and pleasure is subjective. Difficult to measure (ps you could've posted those first two links and cut the joke that is The Daily Mail).

Ya no disagreement there, was just supplying as much info as possible.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezpro...12293/abstract

Meta-analysis results are generally solid evidence of a thing. The authors claim that 10 of 13 studies had some methodological flaws worth considering when weighing the evidence, but they had a couple of excellent-quality designs that came out with the same findings.

I'm inclined to agree (based on the sources from the Psyc Today article) that circumcision doesn't significantly impact penile sensitivity, either between subjects, or before/after.

Pretty surprised by that. Well, I guess I'll have to drop that argument.

If you put them under your pillow, the Eyelid Fairy will give you a shiny quarter.

She doesn't lay dimes on your eyes anymore?

Inflation at work.

I thought it was pennies anyway. That cheap bitch.

For Goof, skip to 16 minutes. Milo knows :afro:

Milo isn't perfect.

We both know that's a lie.

God I wish he was though, it'd make his complaining a lot more justified.

.

Milo is funny like Hillary Clinton is a good candidate.

Milo is vile.

The reason why I like Milo is how reactionary everyone is to everything he does and says. As far as making actual arguments for his cause he's not that great, but he's charismatic and fun. Handsome too.

Pretty much this.

Sometimes I think they bring up good points but for the most Part I'm really unaffected by meninist/feminist cause thankfully PR is not that hung up on PC issues.

I just see this issues on the internet and form an opinion on them just cause it's something to do.

If Men don't have a human right it's quite normal to advocate for it.

If I may ask, do you feel oppressed by society just cause you're a man? I'm not talking in the internet, I'm talking about in your day to day life.

No lmao nobody in the west is oppressed.

Then what's with your previous statement cause I don't get it. How don't we have human rights?

Men can have their genitals cut off as a baby.

None of this is true.

It isn't though, words like 'oppressed' being thrown around like confetti. File with 'systemic' and 'marginalised'.

He said "oppressive", not "oppressed".

Fixed that for you.

What about white males of the LGBTQIAITSFUNTOSTAYATTHEYMCA+ community :confused:

Lol. You dont know what oppression is. Nice slap in the face to all the progression in social development over the last 60 years.

My point is there is a difference between social injustice and oppression.