Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   The Lounge (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/)
-   -   Why does there seem to be a stigma attached to advocate for Men's Rights? (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/85226-why-does-there-seem-stigma-attached-advocate-mens-rights.html)

DwnWthVwls 05-02-2017 07:31 PM

I understand that, but we aren't talking about implementation, we are talking about if it is or is not a violation of equal rights. Or that's what I thought we were talking about.

I also think it arguably has less to do with denying parenting decisions and more to do the the overstepping of religion. I'd argue that if female genital mutilation was part of our religious standards it'd be legal here.

Frownland 05-02-2017 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls (Post 1831050)
I'd argue that if female genital mutilation was part of our religious standards it'd be legal here.

I agree with this.

Blank. 05-02-2017 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goofle (Post 1831030)
No, It's quite literally an equal rights issue. Neither should be legal. Finished.

What about people who don't want to get cheese dick. Sounds like you want to oppress them.

Chula Vista 05-02-2017 09:35 PM

I don't remember my circumcision. I'm so glad my parents decided to go that route. It's never hindered my sexual pleasure a single bit. I also enjoy the clean hoody look.

Female genital mutilation is done for the specific reason of limiting a woman's ability to enjoy sex when the come of age for religious reasons as well as a male's dominance over the females in general.

Equating the two is pretty ****ing stupid and a terrible way to try and make the point some of you are trying to make.

Isbjørn 05-03-2017 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goofle (Post 1831026)
Dude, don't be so massively idiotic. Obviously I think both are barbaric and should be illegal. Wanting BOTH to be illegal is the only morally sound opinion (and yes I know you agree with me Frown, I have no beef with you here).

I agree. Don't mutilate the genitals of children that aren't able to consent, regardless of their sex. It's not that hard.

But female circumsition is more severe since the consequences are life-long.

DwnWthVwls 05-03-2017 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1831092)
Equating the two is pretty ****ing stupid and a terrible way to try and make the point some of you are trying to make.

No one is equating the two except by saying they both violate human rights. Or are you going to sit here and argue with me that murder and speeding are not both breaking the law?

Isbjørn 05-03-2017 03:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls (Post 1831134)
No one is equating the two except by saying they both violate human rights. Or are you going to sit here and argue with me that murder and speeding are not both breaking the law?

I'm against both. I'm just more against female circumsision.

Compare the different procedures. Which one is more harmful? I think the answer is obvious. Why is it wrong to bring that up?

DwnWthVwls 05-03-2017 03:57 AM

I was talking to Chula. Sorry Briks.

Edit: the consequences of circumsion are life ling too.

Goofle 05-03-2017 04:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1831051)
I agree with this.

Obviously it's completely hypothetical, but I don't think it would be. I think given the other kinds of things our societies have gone on to achieve regarding rights and equality I think it would have been outlawed regardless of religious connotations.

But that comes from the standpoint that we care more about the health and safety of women than men.

DwnWthVwls 05-03-2017 04:52 AM

Can you give some examples of these achievements?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 AM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.