Why does there seem to be a stigma attached to advocate for Men's Rights?

**Goofle** · 11-07-2016, 08:48 PM

Assuming you aren't capable of washing yourself properly there are some health benefits. Also that study is absolutely ridiculous. The foreskin actually helps to prevent sexually transmitted diseases.

**Frownland** · 11-07-2016, 08:49 PM

I'm calling zionist conspiracy on this one.

DAT **** STILL AIN""""T RIGHT

**Goofle** · 11-07-2016, 08:50 PM

The Jews are to blame for this one in fairness. And the Muzzas.

Ol’ Qwerty Bastard · 11-07-2016, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goofle

Assuming you aren't capable of washing yourself properly there are some health benefits. Also that study is absolutely ridiculous. The foreskin actually helps to prevent sexually transmitted diseases.

Some research also suggests a reduced likelihood of developing sexually transmitted diseases and HIV infections in circumcised men, and possibly a reduced risk for cervical cancer in female partners of circumcised men. However, while there are potential medical benefits, these data are not sufficient to recommend routine neonatal circumcision of all boys.

Still, I tend to believe the AAP over people on the internet and random .com blog sources.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland

I'm calling zionist conspiracy on this one.

DAT **** STILL AIN""""T RIGHT

It's a matter of opinion as far as I see it. There's benefits to both, hence why the parents should have the right to choose.

The Batlord · 11-07-2016, 08:55 PM

But, like, can we just admit that all the medical reasons in the world are not why we got our dicks chopped? It was for religious nonsense. I got part of my penis removed for a god I never believed in. **** that ****.

Paedantic Basterd · 11-07-2016, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwertyy

It's a matter of opinion as far as I see it. There's benefits to both, hence why the parents should have the right to choose.

Do you feel that pre-emptive wisdom tooth extraction or tonsilectomies are also in the territory of parental decision-making rather than medical opinion?

The ultimate point, I believe, is why cause unnecessary pain to a child? If he's 15 and his foreskin is too tight for his dick, okay, sign him up. But it's unnecessary as a preemptive strike against some sort of uncommon, maybe-unhygienic, treatable infection.

**Frownland** · 11-07-2016, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwertyy

It's a matter of opinion as far as I see it. There's benefits to both, hence why the parents should have the right to choose.

It's totally unnecessary if you don't live in your own filth. Like the saying goes, "let's chop off that dick when the infection gets there."

Ol’ Qwerty Bastard · 11-07-2016, 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord

But, like, can we just admit that all the medical reasons in the world are not why we got our dicks chopped? It was for religious nonsense. I got part of my penis removed for a god I never believed in. **** that ****.

I'm not the slightest bit religious but if I have a son I would have circumcised. I'm not saying it didn't originate from religious non-sense, what I'm saying is the idea that we need to ban it is silly. You're not going to see a difference in quality of life because of it.

Ol’ Qwerty Bastard · 11-07-2016, 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paedantic Basterd

Do you feel that pre-emptive wisdom tooth extraction or tonsilectomies are also in the territory of parental decision-making rather than medical opinion?

The ultimate point, I believe, is why cause unnecessary pain to a child? If he's 15 and his foreskin is too tight for his dick, okay, sign him up. But it's unnecessary as a preemptive strike against some sort of uncommon, maybe-unhygienic, treatable infection.

Because no one remembers the pain and it's safer to do on a baby. I will say as someone has had 4 throat infections and will probably need his tonsils removed, I wish they had have already been removed. I would need to read studies on the risk/benefit to really have an opinion of that though, whereas the information for pros and cons of circumcision can be found easily. Whether everyone chooses to believe it is up to them.

The Batlord · 11-07-2016, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwertyy

I'm not the slightest bit religious but if I have a son I would have circumcised. I'm not saying it didn't originate from religious non-sense, what I'm saying is the idea that we need to ban it is silly. You're not going to see a difference in quality of life because of it.

You know nothing of the difference in quality of life. For all you know you'll never bust a nut that your alt. dimension self with a foreskin would consider worth busting (cause your foreskin has mad pleasure receptors). And all you get is dubious medical whatever, and the benefit of having your dick look like everyone else?

11-07-2016, 08:49 PM	#312 (permalink)
Frownland SOPHIE FOREVER Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: East of the Southern North American West Posts: 35,541	I'm calling zionist conspiracy on this one. DAT **** STILL AIN""""T RIGHT __________________ Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. d e a f b o x