Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
(Post 2127821)
About halfway years ago, I need to take another swing at it.
|
Wait, Frown. You've actually read Finnegans Wake?
What do you feel that you get out of reading it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
(Post 2127832)
Ja, I've spent a good deal of time with the Wake but all in all have only really read the first 100ish pages straight through along with various sections that I've either been told about or randomly flipped to
|
Oops - nvm - just catching up on the thread.
Anyway, I've read about the first 20 pages of Finnegans Wake and couldn't do it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk
(Post 2127839)
There’s no other book that I understood so little of and still enjoyed so immensely. I feel like you have to surrender to it in a way that’s similar to how you have to surrender to an acid trip. Don’t worry about anything except the sentence you’re on. I remember when I came across “Love loves to love love.” and I felt like mother****er yes! I haven’t read Finnegans Wake perhaps because I’ve been told it’s even crazier. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man was sane enough to where I could at least pretend to understand some of it.
Kind of related: Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury is A hella difficult book that’s extraordinarily rewarding to read carefully and slowly enough to unravel its meaning.
|
I've been meaning to read the Sound and the Fury for a long time now. One of the more complex, layered fiction novels that I've read is Under the Volcano by Malcolm Lowry. A beautiful, haunting, difficult book.
|