jwb

lmao @ getting un****ed by Hoover

At the very least, like Chappelle said, if they can kill them we should able to abandon them.

I've thought about the solution to this before. I would propose the idea of an abortion contract. If you get a girl to sign said contract, and she gets pregnant and has the kid anyway, she's on her own as far as raising it.

Similar to how in a prenupt, you can sign a contract that strips you of the rights and entitlements a spouse typically inherits in a divorce, the abortion contract is a voluntary agreement whereby you agree to get an abortion.

If you get knocked up and if you reneg on that and have the kid anyways you thereby relinquish the man from any legal responsibility to care for the kid or pay child support.

The Batlord

Or you can pay your ****ing child support so the kid doesn't have to eat ramen while you pat yourself on the back for going your own way.

__________________

jwb

I mean yea that's a nicer thing to do

You can also donate your money to charity

But you don't have to

If you and the girl agree on the contract and she doesn't honor it that's basically her fault

The Batlord

That's a psychopathic contract. If you have a kid and don't want to contribute to them then I don't think you should be rewarded. I think you should be shot in the head. That kid is also your fault cause you were having fun playing around with mating and no contract can change that.

__________________

YorkeDaddy

This is like an advanced level of dumbass mansplaining. It’s so dumb there isn’t even a term for it

__________________
http://cloudcover1.bandcamp.com/
http://daydreamsociety.bandcamp.com/

9-Time Winner of MusicBanter's "Most Qualified to be a Moderator" Award

jwb

Not really. There's an obvious way to avoid the kid: an abortion.

Women have the say there because it's their body. Yet it's not psychopathic for them to kill the kid even if the man doesn't agree with it, simply cause that's not the direction she wants her life to go.

So there's nothing psychotic about a contract which is completely voluntary on both parties where they agree on the action to be taken in case of a pregnancy. If the woman or the man dont want to enter in said contract they don't have to. And if the contract says abort and the woman enters into it and changes her mind, that's fine too. She just assumes full responsibility for the kid since she single handedly decided to bring it into existence. There's nothing immoral about it.

YorkeDaddy

Only an idiot man would come up with a “solution” that only benefits the man, has zero benefit for the woman, and therefore no woman on earth would ever agree to it for any reason

__________________
http://cloudcover1.bandcamp.com/
http://daydreamsociety.bandcamp.com/

9-Time Winner of MusicBanter's "Most Qualified to be a Moderator" Award

jwb

The prenupt is largely the same sorta thing in most regards.

Yet it exists and many women agree to it.

If nobody agrees to it, then it poses no threat either way. So there's no argument against making it an option. Only an idiot would fail to see that.

The Batlord

I get that you're a robot who doesn't understand these things and so you're just concerned with the thing that helps your side but if I found out that my deadbeat dad not only left me when I was two, but had a contract that gave him the legal right to do so, it would be completely degrading and dehumanizing. I'd think that any man worth speaking of would tear up the contract and pay his child support no matter how mad he was at the mother. So I can only deduce that the only people who would benefit from such a contract would be psychopaths and pathetic man-children.

__________________

jwb

ITT Women are weak and need to be protected