Your Day

**Frownland** · 07-12-2018, 07:52 PM

Nothing's more formidable than choosing the wrong form of a word to prop up your point.

Ideally, the word that you're looking for is "genuinely considering and addressing the points of others on a case by case basis." The accurate word is "dissenter".

Don't you think that elaborating on your claims (not the same thing as furthering your premise btw) would be a better way to convince "retards"?

~~[MERIT]~~ · 07-12-2018, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland

Nothing's more formidable than choosing the wrong form of a word to prop up your point.

Ideally, the word that you're looking for is "genuinely considering and addressing the points of others on a case by case basis." The accurate word is "dissenter".

Don't you think that elaborating on your claims (not the same thing as furthering your premise btw) would be a better way to convince "retards"?

You would rather argue about technicalities and loopholes because that is easier than facing the reality of a civilization in decline.

**Exo** · 07-12-2018, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [MERIT]

reality of a civilization in decline.

Psssshhhhh everybody knows this reality though.

OccultHawk · 07-12-2018, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exo

Psssshhhhh everybody knows this reality though.

Are we ****ed?

**Frownland** · 07-12-2018, 08:20 PM

If you can't flesh out the example that you use to support such an obvious truth, then your example has no substance.

There's a lot of BS out there on every level and it seems like you're arguing that skepticism is a bad thing and that we should just embrace everything that's handed to us without any skepticism because "oh ****, civilization is in decline". I don't trust CNN, I don't trust any politician, I don't trust my family, I don't trust myself, and I don't trust you. You've already thrown so much nonsense my way that I consider researching it worth my time, so if you want to actually convince me of something then you have to put a little bit of legwork in when I think that there are iffy elements to your narrative.

**Exo** · 07-12-2018, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk

Are we ****ed?

Been that way a while now.

OccultHawk · 07-12-2018, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland

If you can't flesh out the example that you use to support such an obvious truth, then your example has no substance.

There's a lot of BS out there on every level and it seems like you're arguing that skepticism is a bad thing and that we should just embrace everything that's handed to us without any skepticism because "oh ****, civilization is in decline". I don't trust CNN, I don't trust any politician, I don't trust my family, I don't trust myself, and I don't trust you. You've already thrown so much nonsense my way that I consider researching it worth my time, so if you want to actually convince me of something then you have to put a little bit of legwork in when I think that there are iffy elements to your narrative.

**Frownland** · 07-12-2018, 08:25 PM

OccultHawk · 07-12-2018, 08:36 PM

Racist

Trollheart · 07-12-2018, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland

If you can't flesh out the example that you use to support such an obvious truth, then your example has no substance.

There's a lot of BS out there on every level and it seems like you're arguing that skepticism is a bad thing and that we should just embrace everything that's handed to us without any skepticism because "oh ****, civilization is in decline". I don't trust CNN, I don't trust any politician, I don't trust my family, I don't trust myself, and I don't trust you. You've already thrown so much nonsense my way that I consider researching it worth my time, so if you want to actually convince me of something then you have to put a little bit of legwork in when I think that there are iffy elements to your narrative.

I'm not trying to be a dick (I don't have to try) but do you mean "not worth my time"? Cos otherwise I don't get it.

07-12-2018, 08:20 PM	#53555 (permalink)
Frownland SOPHIE FOREVER Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: East of the Southern North American West Posts: 35,541	If you can't flesh out the example that you use to support such an obvious truth, then your example has no substance. There's a lot of BS out there on every level and it seems like you're arguing that skepticism is a bad thing and that we should just embrace everything that's handed to us without any skepticism because "oh ***, civilization is in decline". I don't trust CNN, I don't trust any politician, I don't trust my family, I don't trust myself, and I don't trust you. You've already thrown so much nonsense my way that I consider researching it worth my time, so if you want to actually convince me of something then you have to put a little bit of legwork in when I think that there are iffy elements to your narrative. __________________ Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.* d e a f b o x

07-12-2018, 08:25 PM	#53558 (permalink)
Frownland SOPHIE FOREVER Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: East of the Southern North American West Posts: 35,541	__________________ Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. d e a f b o x

07-12-2018, 08:36 PM	#53559 (permalink)
OccultHawk one-balled nipple jockey Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Dirty Souf Biatch Posts: 22,006	Racist __________________ 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND: https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html

07-12-2018, 07:52 PM	#53551 (permalink)
Frownland SOPHIE FOREVER Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: East of the Southern North American West Posts: 35,541	Nothing's more formidable than choosing the wrong form of a word to prop up your point. Ideally, the word that you're looking for is "genuinely considering and addressing the points of others on a case by case basis." The accurate word is "dissenter". Don't you think that elaborating on your claims (not the same thing as furthering your premise btw) would be a better way to convince "retards"?