Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   The Lounge (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/)
-   -   Your Day (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/8425-your-day.html)

Plankton 03-29-2018 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy (Post 1936623)
I might have picked the wrong day to get drunk at home.

https://i.imgur.com/ugOJOwJ.jpg

The Batlord 03-29-2018 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1936628)
Quality of music is subjective, concept of music is not. That would be like arguing that Dee wasn't played on guitar (that's me keeping it going).

Why isn't the concept of music subjective? Music isn't a rock or gravity or man-made global warming or anything that can be proven to exist. It's simply an emergent concept of the brain that may very well simply be a defect of our consciousness' interpretation of patterns, much like religion (ahem... allegedly).

The Batlord 03-29-2018 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy (Post 1936623)
I might have picked the wrong day to get drunk at home.

Bruh, that's in like half a day for us so you'll either be alright or too hungover to bother.

Frownland 03-29-2018 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1936632)
Why isn't the concept of music subjective? Music isn't a rock or gravity or man-made global warming or anything that can be proven to exist. It's simply an emergent concept of the brain that may very well simply be a defect of our consciousness' interpretation of patterns, much like religion (ahem... allegedly).

It's an abstract concept that still remains rooted in objective terms. Can you prove language to exist? How?

grindy 03-29-2018 01:32 PM

I hate timezones.

The Batlord 03-29-2018 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1936635)
It's an abstract concept that still remains rooted in objective terms. Can you prove language to exist? How?

Eh, more "objective" than music, but I'm willing to accept that there's a kernel of objectivity in music's expression of emotion. But then you'd have to agree (if agreeing to my terms) that anything that someone claims as music that doesn't express some kind of objective expression of human emotion isn't actually music, or is at least objectively bad music.

Frownland 03-29-2018 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1936637)
Eh, more "objective" than music, but I'm willing to accept that there's a kernel of objectivity in music's expression of emotion. But then you'd have to agree (if agreeing to my terms) that anything that someone claims as music that doesn't express some kind of objective expression of human emotion isn't actually music, or is at least objectively bad music.

If it aims to express or (*shifts goalposts*) evoke that emotion then it would still be music. I would say that it's ineffective music instead of objectively bad music.

That said, music that would be 100% devoid of human emotion would be jarring at the least since I can't think of any music that doesn't have that connection in some way. If it can successfully evoke the emotion of confusion, then wouldn't that make it a more effective piece than trite music that we've basically been conditioned to ignore?

The Batlord 03-29-2018 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1936641)
If it aims to make express or (*shifts goalposts*) evoke that emotion then it would still be music. I would say that it's ineffective music instead of objectively bad music.

That said, music that would be 100% devoid of human emotion would be jarring at the least since I can't think of any music that doesn't have that connection in some way. If it can successfully evoke the emotion of confusion, then wouldn't that make it a more effective piece than trite music that we've basically been conditioned to ignore?

But what's the distinction between actual music and the general concept of art? To me 4'33's worth is that it exists as a challenge to the concept of what is and what is not music, but is ultimately a portal to the understanding of music without necessarily being music in and of itself. If I were at a performance of 4'33 I would consider the sounds I heard to be potentially music, but those sounds would be divorced from 4'33 itself since they would exist with or without it. The only connection would be giving me a presentation that would encourage me to bridge my idea of sound and music.

4'33 as a concept has no sounds to connect to any "emotional triggers" that music would activate by virtue of the sounds being heard.

grindy 03-29-2018 02:08 PM

I just banned 46 bots.
Where's my ****ing parade?

Oriphiel 03-29-2018 02:11 PM

If a tree falls in the forest and nobody is around to hear it, are Maroon 5 still a shitty band?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:47 AM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.