|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-10-2016, 05:34 PM | #36801 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
^King's It has a pretty solid ending. Well, the ending ending isn't great, but the part that resolves most of the story with the turtle and **** was mindblowing.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
05-10-2016, 05:42 PM | #36803 (permalink) |
Toasted Poster
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
|
The Mist is pretty damn great. The movie adaption was TERRIBLE!!!!!! Also his collaboration with Peter Straub, The Talisman is amazing.
__________________
“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” |
05-10-2016, 05:47 PM | #36804 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
I read the novella after I saw the movie and agree that the original is much much better, but I still thought the movie was pretty good. The ending was an obvious executive decision to have a non-ambiguous ending and that really sucked, but otherwise it didn't really have too much going against it except for subpar acting (which is to be expected).
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
05-10-2016, 06:22 PM | #36805 (permalink) |
Toasted Poster
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
|
Some of the special effects were pretty lame.
__________________
“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” |
05-10-2016, 06:34 PM | #36806 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
*cough* says the guy lauding The Thing *cough*
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
05-10-2016, 06:43 PM | #36807 (permalink) | ||
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
Quote:
Did King get better at endings as he went on, or was he just hit-or-miss? The only three of his books I think I've read all the way through were Carrie, Salem's Lot, and Pet Cemetary, all of which had goofy endings. Carrie was amazing all the way until she left the prom, after which the concept was good, but, it being his first book, he clearly just didn't know how to write what he wanted to put on the page. I've only read his early works, but throughout that time at least, his prose was always merely serviceable, and I think that was very apparent at the end of that book, since if he had been a more accomplished writer the ending wouldn't have felt as flat. I do give him credit, however, for writing a more nihilistic ending than the movie, which was pretty good, but also flubbed the ending in more ways than just execution (After the prom the movie was just conceptually inferior, that very last scene was just kind of dumb, and don't get me started on the cheesy firehose part of the prom scene.) P.S. I think that entire book was probably the main inspiration for Akira (even more than the movie, due to the relative similarity with the endings). My criticisms for Salem's Lot and Pet Cemetery are identical. Both were fantastic in their own way (Salem's Lot is the only book to legitimately give me the heeby jeebies, and Pet Cemetery was a psychological triumph), but the endings felt like self-conscious attempts at making scenes that would work as Hollywood movies. Both were just bad, and ruined the brilliant vibes that each had meticulously built in almost self-consciously deliberate lessons in how to show the monster "too much".
__________________
Quote:
|
||
05-10-2016, 06:44 PM | #36808 (permalink) | |
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
As in the book? Cause the movie is pretty much considered one of the best horror movies of all time, though I have yet to watch the original. Was the book inferior, or was the movie just overrated?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
05-10-2016, 06:59 PM | #36809 (permalink) | |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
Quote:
Nah, the movie. I agree that it's fantastic, but let's be honest, it had some pretty awful graphics.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
|