Burning Down |
04-10-2014 03:22 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by YorkeDaddy
(Post 1437828)
Sounds like it'd be an interesting class as long as you dig the topic. Probably a lot of work and research though which isn't everybody's cup of tea haha. I'm a far bigger fan of the traditional classes that are basically: here's a textbook. Read it dilligently and you get an A, otherwise you don't and that's all there is to the class. I've always felt that it's much easier to control your own destiny in classes like that, whereas classes that are nothing but papers can pretty much be random depending on how the grader feels about what you did.
|
I was in music, and music isn't really textbook based. The history classes are, but that's it. So it's hard for me to say whether I would have enjoyed that more. Music is all about the practical application of your knowledge and your skills. Besides the history, in the first two years it's all about knowing your theory (done through weekly assignments), your ears and hearing skills (ear training, being able to detect differences in pitches, and the quality of chords), and analysis of classical works through listening and following the score. In the upper years, you focus more on composition, choral and orchestral conducting (so hard, ugh), arranging, improvisation on your instrument, and of course research. Instrument performance is a main focus the whole time.
I think people in other academic programs tend to think that music, or even other fine arts programs are a breeze because they don't know that most of our work is not actually sitting at a desk reading and writing. They think we just listen to music all day :laughing:
|