JonMJ33 |
09-01-2015 09:46 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadChannel
(Post 1632241)
Gonna take a moment to break all this down.
|
You can break it down as much as you desire.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadChannel
(Post 1632241)
Neither of those things are good evidence.
|
Why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadChannel
(Post 1632241)
You can find someone who will tell you almost anything.
|
Irrelevant with regards to whether or not he is telling the truth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadChannel
(Post 1632241)
Furthermore, Richard Dolan is neither a historian nor a reliable source.
|
Dolan got his graduate degree from the University of Rochester and also studied at Oxford. He was also a finalist for a Rhodes Scholarship.
How is he not a historian?
How is he not a reliable source?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadChannel
(Post 1632241)
Also, someone, even a government, taking something seriously is not indicative of it's validity if there is no other evidence.
|
There is other evidence, did you not read what I presented? Also, I think you are confusing the word evidence with proof. What I am presenting is evidence to show the validity within Ufology, 100% proof is what ufology strives for and is the reason why more research needs to be done through official channels. This is why there is a huge push for disclosure and why many in ufology want official Congressional hearings
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadChannel
(Post 1632241)
I can make a lot of claims, and then say that the truth is being hidden by the government/aliens/whatever, but that doesn't exempt me from the burden of proof.
|
There is plenty of evidence to show that something is going on. If generals, astronauts, cosmonauts, intelligence agents, military personnel, scientists, aerospace engineers, FAA officials, pilots, government personnel and police officers around the world are testifying to the validity of the phenomenon, then I think it just might be a bit prudent to listen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadChannel
(Post 1632241)
Again, excuses for lack of evidence do not equate to evidence.
|
Right, evidence equates to evidence and I have given you some examples.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadChannel
(Post 1632241)
Google what the word anecdotal means, and why it doesn't qualify as evidence.
|
Quote:
In the law, testimony is a form of evidence that is obtained from a witness who makes a solemn statement or declaration of fact.-Wikipedia/Testimony
|
Quote:
In law, rules of evidence govern the types of evidence that are admissible in a legal proceeding. Types of legal evidence include testimony, documentary evidence, and physical evidence.-Wikipedia/Evidence
|
|