Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

Isn't the lack of proof reason enough?

Originally Posted by Wpnfire

I didn’t say either of them can’t be suggested though.

A certain type of black hole is theorized to contain wormholes to possibly another universe, but we’ve never been close enough to one of these black holes to see it. A facsimile of this is shown in Interstellar, but the black hole in that movie was purely hypothetical.

Originally Posted by DeadChannel

The burden of proof lies upon the maker of positive claims. I do not believe is not a positive claim, it is a reaction to the lack of evidence.

For instance:

"I do not believe in god" is not a positive claim. It is simply an acknowledgement of the lack of concrete, evidential reason for belief.

"I believe that there is no god" is a positive claim. For this statement to be supported, you would have to provide evidence for why a god does not or could not exist.

This seems a lot like semantics, but it's actually a pretty important part of logic.