Are you democrat, republican, independent, or other, and why? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Political party?
Democrat 10 25.00%
Republican 5 12.50%
Independent 9 22.50%
Other 16 40.00%
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2014, 03:20 AM   #131 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josef K View Post
I mean sure, but no matter how great our education system is we shouldn't be denying the vote to people because they can't give a satidfactory definition of socialism.
If they're incapable of understanding the issue they're voting for then aren't they just causing more harm than good?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2014, 02:23 PM   #132 (permalink)
Oracle
 
RoxyRollah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Closer then you think.....
Posts: 4,365
Default

Can anyone name a country where socialism actually makes folks happy? Sweden doesn't count.

In my honest, and hopefully non offensive opinion socialism at it's very core make up is saying everyone is the same. And you should all be happy about it. Now all men are created equal, but ABSOLUTELY not gifted equally. So for example that is saying that it doesn't matter if you invented a laser that can scratch your ass from outer space you shouldn't be allowed make more then the simpleton flipping burgers at the Kyrstal's across the street. And if you do, you should share it.

I'm all about sharing, caring, and hugs not drugs and whatever, but for me to be forced into sharing what I have busted my ass to achieve even when all odds were against me and everyone laughed, is plain and simple robbery. And a government, should not rob it's people. Capitalism, gets such a bad rap, when in essence it's what 98% of people immigrate here for. The dollar and the chance for a better life. And the people who were born here(Usa) forget that, what we take for granted others do not.

So ask me again if I want the brilliant and talented doctor doing my tripple bypass (that I am now in need of because I ate myself to death with double quater pounders) to be paid the same as the slacker barely passed med school by the skin of his teeth. No I don't. Because if you are good at something never do it for free and it's that's doctors right to charge what he sees fit for his services. That is a buyer/seller relationship on it's base level. And I most certainly want to get what I pay for, not what the government see's fit to pay my brilliant and talented surgeon.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuitarBizarre View Post
Roxy is unable to perpetrate violence. It always somehow turns into BDSM between two consenting adults.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
I just want to say your tits are lovely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by grindy View Post
Roxy is the William S. Burroughs of our time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan View Post
I like Roxy, she's awesome and her taste in music far exceeds yours. Roxy is in the Major League bro, and you're like a sad clown in a two bit rodeo.
RoxyRollah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2014, 05:09 PM   #133 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

it sounds like you're talking about communism. i don't really think wages need to be equal. but i think that we should invest in certain things as a society, as i believe these things will actually make us a better and more prosperous society. things like education, healthcare, infrastructure, scientific research, etc. which means taxing people. and i think the tax rates should go up the more you make. which is in a way a redistribution of wealth. but the data shows that when we don't redistribute wealth we head in the direction of a two tiered system, with the super rich on one side and everyone else on the other. and this has its own set of problems which concern me more than some vague principle that everyone should pull themselves up by the bootstraps and get to work.
John Wilkes Booth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2014, 05:11 PM   #134 (permalink)
A Jew on a motorbike!
 
Josef K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 800
Default

You're not talking about communism or socialism. Communism is by definition a stateless society, so wages wouldn't be set by the government, because there would be no government.
Josef K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2014, 05:23 PM   #135 (permalink)
A Jew on a motorbike!
 
Josef K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth View Post
why not?
Because I don't think it would be that complicated a process, and because I've just never done it - I didn't say that was a good thing, but it's true.
Quote:
with or without a state backing the system up?
With - I'm pretty moderate.
Quote:
why?
Because when you start saying certain people can't vote, you're opening the door to their oppression because they can't protect themselves and because you've already told everyone they're a lower class of person. Loss of democracy leads to erosion of civil rights (and it is itself erosion of civil rights, but it leads to the loss of rights other than to vote). Democracy can also be a powerful tool for egalitarianism.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
If they're incapable of understanding the issue they're voting for then aren't they just causing more harm than good?
It's a problem, but it should be solved by more education. Barring people from voting is functionally hard - where do you draw the line? If it's by some test, how do you write the test in a way that's fair to everyone? - and whatever harms there are from uneducated people voting are far outweighed by loss of democracy.
Josef K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2014, 05:48 PM   #136 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josef K View Post
Because I don't think it would be that complicated a process,
you don't think restructuring the economic and political infrastructure would be a complicated process?

Quote:
Because when you start saying certain people can't vote, you're opening the door to their oppression because they can't protect themselves and because you've already told everyone they're a lower class of person.
you might have misunderstood me (i was pretty vague). i'm not saying why not let some people vote and not others. i'm saying why do people need to have a say in their government in general? which your next section touches on a bit more..

Quote:
Loss of democracy leads to erosion of civil rights (and it is itself erosion of civil rights, but it leads to the loss of rights other than to vote). Democracy can also be a powerful tool for egalitarianism.
so basically democracy is a safe-guard against tyranny. that is basically how i have always thought about it as well. but this assumes that any non-democratic government will by definition act in a tyrannical way.

what if there were a state that had the goals which were determined with the state's population's best interests in mind but wasn't obliged to incessantly campaign for public approval in their attempts to achieve those goals? do you think democracy might slow us down?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josef K View Post
You're not talking about communism or socialism. Communism is by definition a stateless society, so wages wouldn't be set by the government, because there would be no government.
in theory... but not in the real world.
John Wilkes Booth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2014, 07:46 PM   #137 (permalink)
A Jew on a motorbike!
 
Josef K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth View Post
you don't think restructuring the economic and political infrastructure would be a complicated process?
I mean I've heard about some businesses who are becoming co-ops on their own. It would be a nasty political fight, but you could do it gradually - start with incentives, like the government will cover some percentage of health-care costs if businesses do certain things for democracy, then mandate that companies have some employees on their board, and so on.
Quote:
so basically democracy is a safe-guard against tyranny. that is basically how i have always thought about it as well. but this assumes that any non-democratic government will by definition act in a tyrannical way.

what if there were a state that had the goals which were determined with the state's population's best interests in mind but wasn't obliged to incessantly campaign for public approval in their attempts to achieve those goals? do you think democracy might slow us down?
Without democracy, there's no way to hold them accountable. You can tell me that in the hypothetical they're totally benevolent and great people, but that isn't very useful because the reason why we need democracy is we can't just trust that our leaders have our best interests in mind.
Quote:
in theory... but not in the real world.
I mean there's never been communism in the real world, and there probably won't be in the foreseeable future on any decent-sized scale (you could count kibbutzes or something, I guess).
Josef K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2014, 08:09 PM   #138 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josef K View Post
I mean I've heard about some businesses who are becoming co-ops on their own. It would be a nasty political fight, but you could do it gradually - start with incentives, like the government will cover some percentage of health-care costs if businesses do certain things for democracy, then mandate that companies have some employees on their board, and so on.
don't you think there is a difference between having a couple co-op's emerge from the market and having a full fledged socialist economy?

if incentives will work then why is it so unlikely that you will see a socialist govt in your lifetime?

Quote:
Without democracy, there's no way to hold them accountable. You can tell me that in the hypothetical they're totally benevolent and great people, but that isn't very useful because the reason why we need democracy is we can't just trust that our leaders have our best interests in mind.
so you're willing to entertain hypothetical versions of socialism but not hypothetical versions of totalitarianism?

Quote:
I mean there's never been communism in the real world, and there probably won't be in the foreseeable future on any decent-sized scale (you could count kibbutzes or something, I guess).
M-L-M Mayhem!: Please Stop Talking About "True Communism"
John Wilkes Booth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2014, 08:43 PM   #139 (permalink)
A Jew on a motorbike!
 
Josef K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth View Post
don't you think there is a difference between having a couple co-op's emerge from the market and having a full fledged socialist economy?

if incentives will work then why is it so unlikely that you will see a socialist govt in your lifetime?
Because the issue is that nobody in a position of power would vote for this kind of thing, not that it couldn't be implemented.
Quote:
so you're willing to entertain hypothetical versions of socialism but not hypothetical versions of totalitarianism?
They're very different things. You're asking me to assume that there are people in power who are flawless and will always look out for the best interests of everyone, while I'm asking you to assume that Congress passes and the President signs a series of legislation that transitions us to a co-op based economy.
I'm not arguing that "the true beauty of communism has never been realized". I'm not making an ideological argument. Whether or not communism is a good thing, it hasn't happened.
Josef K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2014, 08:01 AM   #140 (permalink)
Groupie
 
FishlessExistence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 48
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoxyRollah View Post
Can anyone name a country where socialism actually makes folks happy? Sweden doesn't count.

In my honest, and hopefully non offensive opinion socialism at it's very core make up is saying everyone is the same. And you should all be happy about it. Now all men are created equal, but ABSOLUTELY not gifted equally. So for example that is saying that it doesn't matter if you invented a laser that can scratch your ass from outer space you shouldn't be allowed make more then the simpleton flipping burgers at the Kyrstal's across the street. And if you do, you should share it.

I'm all about sharing, caring, and hugs not drugs and whatever, but for me to be forced into sharing what I have busted my ass to achieve even when all odds were against me and everyone laughed, is plain and simple robbery. And a government, should not rob it's people. Capitalism, gets such a bad rap, when in essence it's what 98% of people immigrate here for. The dollar and the chance for a better life. And the people who were born here(Usa) forget that, what we take for granted others do not.

So ask me again if I want the brilliant and talented doctor doing my tripple bypass (that I am now in need of because I ate myself to death with double quater pounders) to be paid the same as the slacker barely passed med school by the skin of his teeth. No I don't. Because if you are good at something never do it for free and it's that's doctors right to charge what he sees fit for his services. That is a buyer/seller relationship on it's base level. And I most certainly want to get what I pay for, not what the government see's fit to pay my brilliant and talented surgeon.
Lol. This isn't socialism at all. Also, why does Sweden not count? What about the other Nordic countries? Seriously man, socialism isn't about sharing everything one owns or making everybody's wages equal like a real life Imagine by John Lennon. Modern socialism is mostly concerned with equal rights for all people regardless of ecomic status. Look at Sweden, Norway, Finland, and others for good examples.

On the other hand, you have countries which claim to be socialistic but in fact cling to outdated ideas and aren't much better than dictatorships. It's a bit like North Korea being a "democracy".
FishlessExistence is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.