2tonelol

So the supreme court made a decision that backed up the president cool no problems there then!!
I doubt iraq has got any weapons though i dont think you could find a stick in one piece in that place.

I have certainly never been any where near Iraq however,I have familly who had a business in the holiday trade to Iraq( i swear on my life ppl actually were going there on holiday!!! sounds like a Dead Kennedy's tune!!) and after long discussions with them and listening to their opinions i am in the mind that the right thing happened by going to war i just think they did it telling us lies why they were and that is not acceptable in my book!!!
I would deny being ignorant but i dont know what it means!! (yes very droll indeed!!)

__________________
Jesus is coming!!!! Look Busy!!!!

http://liquidator.mysite.freeserve.com/

Interactive

A Supreme court that was entirely appointed by the Clinton-Gore-Whitehouse.

You doubt? They were launching scuds off at Israel and you doubt they have any WMDs? Saddam had ample time to move them to Syria...

2tonelol

How would it of looked to the rest of the world if the 'Greatest Democracy' on the face of the planet had chucked out the wrong result,no one was ever gonna put your country in that position.You would have too much face to lose,especialy when dealing with rogue nations who do not allow there ppl a vote.
I know you know that some of your presidents have had a checkered career to say the least,and your nation has many stories that show your government to act in an underhanded fasion,turning a blind eye to an election result sounds fairly mild in comparison.
The fact is Sadam didn't have those weapons THIS TIME and thats that.He didn't have them.That puts the 'coalition' in the we got it wrong gang.If they find WMD out there now do you think the world will say,oh they did have them after all? Or is it more likely that most ppl will take the view that they 'found' WMD.It's to late to find them now.The lie your president and my prime minister told was that they were ready to assemble in 45 mins.We have been there how long?? We can't find a BB gun!!! They had nothing to find.As you say they had already shot their load over Israel.That was the time to take direct action.
Bush's and Blairs replacements may be no better but dont let the same man keep telling you lies or acting underhanded,because one day you wake up and it's too late.Ask any Iraqi!

__________________
Jesus is coming!!!! Look Busy!!!!

http://liquidator.mysite.freeserve.com/

Interactive

Wow, wow hold on a second as I mentioned earlier there's no definite proof that there isn't any and there's no definite proof that there is at this time.

Shot their load over Israel? No, Saddam had alot more than what he shot over at Israel.

Kerry is by no means any better than Bush, especially when it comes to the military, the guy's a raging idiot with no tact whatsoever.

2tonelol

Saddams got these weapons and he's sitting there and there is no doubt in his mind at all that the west is after him.He's sitting on a stockpile of weapons that are dangerous enough that 2 of the richest nations on the face of the planet consider it a threat.Does he use them? No he goes on the run and hides in a hole in the floor with a load of cash.Doesn't make sense!!
If he had a single weapon to hand he would of used them! No doubt! Bush and Blair couldn't wait to tell us that he used them on his own ppl,unyet he doesn't use them when his country is invaded! Come on!!! What was he saving them for?????

Kerry is the raging idiot with no tact.

If i went through all the newspapers printed,worldwide since Bush was 'elected' i wonder how many times i would see that sentance starting with Bush's name?
Hasn't this kerry got quite a good and accountable milatary carreer behind him,has even been honoured i believe,where as again there seems to be (oh no) yet another dark cloud of grey area hanging over Bush's military history.

I believe that Kery actually served in Vietnam,i would rather get sent to war by a man who has been there as he knows just what he's sending ppl in to.Plus he's not asking them to do something he wouldn't do himself.

As i said before.i am no fan of either man,but America simply must be able to offer a better choice than Bush.

__________________
Jesus is coming!!!! Look Busy!!!!

http://liquidator.mysite.freeserve.com/

Interactive

First off, Kerry.

A honorable record? By no means. He went to Vietnam as a Comm Specialist if I remember right and was there for a few years, came back and joined the protestors and started calling his fellow soldiers terrorists (he was buddies with Jane Fonda basically).

Bush on the otherhand was accused of going AWOL (away without leave), which is actually a bit odd. One because he was in the reserves (1 weekend a month, 2 weeks a year kind of thing) and was supposidly gone for 4 months. Many reservists do 'this' (being taking time away from the reserves) when they're going to say training for their regular job. The democrats are just stamping this as AWOL because they are trying to get the Military vote, which will never happen as Kerry wants to give control of the Military to the UN.

Saddam lost all control of his military basically when the country was begining to be liberated so therefore unless he "pushed the button" himself they wouldn't have launched do to lack of communications and the like. My belief is that they're being stored (as in non-operating condition) in Syria.

- Smack -

No idea..

I just hope that dont get another **** face like Bush in there

__________________

jibber

^ just out of curiosity, you say that you support bush because you support many of the decisions he has made and share his opinions on alot of issues. does this stretch to ammending the constitution to ban *** marriages? how do others feel on the subject? (i'll admit this is a little off topic, but interesting nonetheless.)

__________________
What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road.
William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways

Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass.

HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER

Interactive

Yup, I totally support him (on the particular subject) and I am against homosexual marriages. It's against most state's constitution and IMHO it is against the federal government constitution..

jibber

as it stands it is not against the federal constitution, which is why bush wants to ammend it to specifically ban *** marriages. which brings up a whole new topic of why someone would be against homosexual marriages. Not allowing ***s to marry is an act of discrimination, and as america prides itself on being open to diversity and non-discriminatory (ya right), shouldn't laws be changed to allow for ***s to have equal rights as well?

__________________
What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road.
William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways

Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass.

HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER