The philosophical thoughts thread! - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-09-2013, 01:10 PM   #51 (permalink)
Maelian
 
ladyislingering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 695
Default

What if the only reason anyone's ever seen "the other side" via near-death experience is because of the last glimmer of consciousness, essentially filling the void with their idea of what would happen if they died?
__________________
You and I,
We were born to die.
ladyislingering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2013, 01:59 PM   #52 (permalink)
Prepare 4 the Fight Scene
 
Mondo Bungle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 7,675
Default

We're all in the Bardo.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oriphiel View Post
Hmm, what's this in my pocket?

*epic guitar solo blasts into my face*

DAMN IT MONDO
Mondo Bungle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2013, 02:20 PM   #53 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 899
Default

If you don't die, who is going to pay for retirement when your money runs out?

And if my own father's death is any indication, there is a time when it is better to be dead than alive.
Lord Larehip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2013, 02:23 PM   #54 (permalink)
watching the wheels
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 470
Default

we all are aliens for someone who lives on some other planet.
Taxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2013, 08:50 PM   #55 (permalink)
Shoo Thoughts
 
Mr. Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: These Mountains
Posts: 2,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p-bo View Post
I believe there are universal morals/beliefs that most people share, regardless of culture, religion, or upbringing. Just normal human decencies that most people share. Based of these, and your opinions, he's my question.

You have two people. One with the urge to commit a "wrong", yet refrains from such an action. The other has no such urge and therefore commits no transgression.

Example - Two priests. One is attracted to young men. One is not. Neither ever engages in such activity. The priest who has no interests/desires has an easier road. The priest with the desires uses every bit of his willpower to refrain. Who's better in you eyes/ God's eyes/ the eyes of the common good?

If this example is distasteful to you, fill in the blanks. It shouldn't make much difference what situation you use.
Neither is better in my eyes. In God's eyes and the common good's? I couldn't possibly say.
Mr. Charlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2013, 06:20 AM   #56 (permalink)
WILDFIRE
 
Dulce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 232
Default

if i'd traveled back in a time machine - i'd questioned the following:

dark matter versus dark energy or the speed of light or the jesus times or dinosaur times

i dunno, it's like 4:20 AM.
Dulce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2013, 06:34 AM   #57 (permalink)
watching the wheels
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Charlie View Post
Neither is better in my eyes. In God's eyes and the common good's? I couldn't possibly say.
Don't know but I have been told that a desire is not a sin, it only becomes a sin if you fulfill it.
Taxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2013, 12:15 PM   #58 (permalink)
Shoo Thoughts
 
Mr. Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: These Mountains
Posts: 2,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taxman View Post
Don't know but I have been told that a desire is not a sin, it only becomes a sin if you fulfill it.
Agreed. That's why they're equal in my eyes. Neither's actions are harmful.
Mr. Charlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2013, 03:26 PM   #59 (permalink)
Groupie
 
p-bo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Charlie View Post
Agreed. That's why they're equal in my eyes. Neither's actions are harmful.
I'm not looking for harmful. Perhaps a different example. 2 students both score 1550 on SAT. One through hard work and dedication. The other through natural ability with very little effort. Or 2 athletes, musicians, etc...

Basically, do you weigh effort in equal results? Do you penalize people for bare minimum? If you considered Mozart and Beethoven equals, would you add merit to Beethoven as an over achiever or deduct Mozart as an under achiever?
__________________
“Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action”
p-bo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2013, 05:45 PM   #60 (permalink)
Shoo Thoughts
 
Mr. Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: These Mountains
Posts: 2,308
Default

I don't mind bare minimum. Indeed I'm an advocate of bare minimum (or one lazy motherf*cker). It's worth remembering that everything in nature likes to occupy the lowest energy state possible - it's called the principle of minimum energy. Be it a hurricane, an earthquake, a supernova or black hole - it's all nature using the least amount of energy it can.



Mr. Charlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.