GuitarBizarre

Yes. Its a permanent emblazonment of an image by which you will be judged by others around you in some capacity for the rest of your natural life, and which can only be removed in the event of regret by lengthy and prohibitively expensive laser surgery which carries with it a commensurate likelihood of severe scarring.

As a result, it is to be expected that when considering an image to apply to their body in this manner, the average person will spend some significant portion of time considering the possible future implications of the process.

It is also significant that persons whose choices in this regard include the possibility of placing Kurt Cobain on their person, are generally younger than the age of 25, primarily teenage. As a result, these persons cognitive development has not yet completed following puberty, as a healthy human being's cognitive processes are not considered to have fully developed until the mid to late twenties depending on the person. This has been found to be fact by many significant medical journals, and forms the primary rationale behind various arbiters of decision making in law, such as minimum drinking age and age of consent laws across most western cultures.

Correspondingly, the choice of placing such an image permanently on one's body is considered to be a generally unwise idea unless backed up with a significant display of intellectual capacity, sufficient to eliminate suspicion from the minds of others, of the possibility that the person engaging in such a practice will regret the decision a whole goddamned lot by the time they hit their 30s.

Thus far however I have to say you have acted in precisely the opposite manner, and subsequently the general opinion of others in this instance has seemed to indicate we think you're being silly.

__________________