|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-10-2012, 09:58 AM | #121 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,711
|
That's a bit off topic. Vanilla posed a question, people are just giving honest answers.
She's far from ugly, but a tad too big I'd say. Also, all these people have model faces. Your average size 16 person off the street doesn't look nearly as good to be honest. Size 12 looks pretty damn good. Last edited by midnight rain; 04-10-2012 at 10:20 AM. |
04-10-2012, 03:15 PM | #122 (permalink) |
Blue Pill Oww
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Posts: 1,107
|
They're all beautiful in their own way.
__________________
https://www.instagram.com/hennas.lullaby/ |
04-10-2012, 04:23 PM | #124 (permalink) |
Stoned and Jammin' Out
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern California; Eugene, OR; mobile
Posts: 1,602
|
The size 4-8 on the far left is not my style. If she were 5 foot 1, sure, she'd probably be much cuter in my book. But she's too tall to be that skinny. It's almost unhealthy at that point isn't it. I'd rather either of the other two. Yes, that girl that is size 16 in that picture is more attractive than the 4-8 on the opposite side, especially her facial features. But, yeah, if the girl in the middle was into me, I'd have a heart attack and die, because she is too pretty.
What's up with the stances? I don't know what the picture was taken for, but couldn't they have just done it mug-shot style, arms at sides, no raised knees? If they were trying to compare, I'm not sure why they all strike different poses... |
04-10-2012, 06:07 PM | #126 (permalink) | |
D-D-D-D-D-DROP THE BASS!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,730
|
> Thread about poor, judgemental attitudes towards women of certain body types, mentioning plus size. > Proceeds to go too far in the other direction and ends up calling skinny girls "nasty". This is the problem with these threads.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
04-10-2012, 06:09 PM | #127 (permalink) |
Registered Jimmy Rustler
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,360
|
Not that anyone wants to know but I would ravage all three given the chance.
__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew* *Always Checks Credentials Crew* *nba > nfl crew* *Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew* |
04-10-2012, 06:12 PM | #128 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,483
|
She's not nasty in general, just her legs are way too skinny. Compared to some of the things said in this thread it really wasn't meant that way. Fact is, she's just as unhealthy as the bigger girl, if not more.
|
04-10-2012, 06:31 PM | #130 (permalink) |
Ba and Be.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: This Is England
Posts: 17,331
|
Number 3 for me all the way. Number 2 is stunning but way out of my league and how often are you going to come across women looking like that who just happen to be down to earth to boot? Number one? I would be scared to jump it in fear of breakages.
As to the OP, if I posted near naked pictures of myself then I would expect all sorts of criticism regardless of body shape or size. You would be surprised as to what MEN are looking for and appreciate but not be surprised that people are giving opinions either whether they are positive, negative or downright ugly. Is it nice to read negativity? Of course it isn't but this is the digital age and it is commonplace now but it is not a 'snapshot' of what every person thinks regarding body size. It's easy to be negative in life, it's the positives that one should cling to.
__________________
“A cynic by experience, a romantic by inclination and now a hero by necessity.”
|
|