The appeal to pedophilia? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-26-2011, 05:27 PM   #21 (permalink)
s_k
Music Addict
 
s_k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,206
Default

Hahaha, love that last sentence. The serious tone in it makes me laugh out loud.

You know, I can understand guys who see a 16 or 17 year old and think 'looks nice...'. This probably has happened to me before and wel yeah, who gives a ****. But apart from thinking so, I never tried anything. But actual kids? Even if you do have these desires... Why destroy someone's life? It seems so egoistic.
__________________
Click here to see my collection
s_k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 05:28 PM   #22 (permalink)
AWhatup Ganache?
 
Mykonos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 381
Default

I think I can agree the most with the udea of making them repress their sexual urges. Something like a sexual preference is ridiculously difficult (arguably impossible) to rewrite, but in the big indoctrination we call life, sex drives don't quite share the same untouchable status. You could probably convince a paedophile that his rape fantasies should never become reality with far greater ease than you could convice him that children aren't attractive.
__________________
'Not that Becktionary, the Rhyming Becktionary!'- Bender Bending Rodriguez
Mykonos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 05:40 PM   #23 (permalink)
s_k
Music Addict
 
s_k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,206
Default

But where do you draw the line?
At people who actually raped a kid? At people who watch that sort of porn? At people who have at some point in their live admitted they are interested in kids in that way?
__________________
Click here to see my collection
s_k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 05:43 PM   #24 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Paedantic Basterd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,184
Default

People who are guilty of rape, across any age and any gender, are despicable and should receive the full punitive action of society and the law.

People who are guilty of possession of child pornography, or who admit to an attraction to children, but who have never acted upon their desires, should be monitored, and provided psychological aid.
Paedantic Basterd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 05:47 PM   #25 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Thom Yorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by s_k View Post
But where do you draw the line?
At people who actually raped a kid? At people who watch that sort of porn? At people who have at some point in their live admitted they are interested in kids in that way?
The issue with child porn isn't so much with the people that watch it but rather how it got out there, at least in my opinion. In a perfect world there would be no child porn out there, so people wouldn't be allowed to watch it, but at least watching it is better than actually physically acting upon their urges. To have those thoughts in your head is abnormal but I don't see any issue in them having those thoughts. They can't help it. They should be helped though. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, drugs to decrease sex drive, etc.
Thom Yorke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 05:54 PM   #26 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by s_k View Post
Hahaha, love that last sentence. The serious tone in it makes me laugh out loud.

You know, I can understand guys who see a 16 or 17 year old and think 'looks nice...'. This probably has happened to me before and wel yeah, who gives a ****. But apart from thinking so, I never tried anything. But actual kids? Even if you do have these desires... Why destroy someone's life? It seems so egoistic.
16 or 17 is a different story entirely...it might be "wrong" in the lawful sense but it doesn't represent anywhere near the same magnitude of sexual corruption as being attracted to children who haven't achieved puberty yet.

I think for some men, there might even be a certain mysticism about the pubescent female -- look no further than Nabokov's Lolita for evidence of that.
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 05:55 PM   #27 (permalink)
( ̄ー ̄)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,270
Default

Pedophilia and ephebophilia are sexual preferences, just as homosexuality and heterosexuality are sexual preferences. Pedophiles do not "develop" an attraction to minors just as homosexuals do not "develop" an attraction to the same sex; it's an inborn trait that cannot be changed. In that sense, there is nothing morally wrong with being sexually attracted to minors because it's not something that you actively choose.

What IS morally reprehensible is when you choose to engage in inappropriate actions with someone who is too young to consent/understand the full consequences of their actions.

I think it's just a sucky truth that pedophiles can't help the way they feel but are hatred with vitrol by most of society anyway.
RVCA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 05:55 PM   #28 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Paedantic Basterd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,184
Default

Hopefully though, we're all aware of the fact that teenagers don't know **** about their sexuality, and that's the primary reason we shouldn't be bonking them.
Paedantic Basterd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 05:58 PM   #29 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,773
Default

I'll stick to bonking middle aged women.
Farfisa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 06:00 PM   #30 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Thom Yorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer_sam View Post
16 or 17 is a different story entirely...it might be "wrong" in the lawful sense but it doesn't represent anywhere near the same magnitude of sexual corruption as being attracted to children who haven't achieved puberty yet.
16 or 17 is a completely different story, yeah. If they have the qualities of an older woman that you find attractive, then you're attracted to them, which is fine if you don't act on it. this isn't usually an issue, because most just opt to go for older women as it's socially acceptable.

There is of course being attracted to the idea of someone being underage though. I know there's a paraphilia where people are attracted specifically to people that are right around the age of consent, can't remember the name though.
Thom Yorke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.