![]() |
Quote:
Our nation's history is littered with problems that needed regulation. Just ask Upton Sinclair... |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If I am talking rubbish when I blast the NFL for not concerning itself with protecting players from concussions until recent years, then I am doing so along with numerous sports commentators, the U.S. Congress, and parents of children who are permanently injured or dead due to concussions and inappropriate responses to injuries in American football at the high school and college levels. Do you realize how many players of American football have suffered brain injury due to concussions? I am not the only one concerned: Quote:
I'm glad that the NFL is now trying to educate players so they are better protected. Why would you oppose safety measures that can make a big difference in the safety of players? I'm also glad you didn't get severely injured playing rugby, presumably league ;). I'm sorry that so many players of American football have not been so lucky, often due to simple lack of attention to important safety measures that should have been taken, such as making sure helmets pass standards that actually protect athletes effectively: Quote:
Quote:
The players could still smack each other's ass, though. I always like that part! :D |
:banghead:
|
The NFL League officials have fought efforts to make the sport safer for the players...because, of course, that would cut into how much money team owners, etc., can make. Such a noble game! (Yes, I am mocking the NFL League leadership for having refused for so long to make the game safer for players.)
This is what you originally said. When I read that, I don't see any implications or talk about the work the NFL HAS been doing to try and limit injuries and keep the game as safe as possible. What you said doesn't even make sense at times.. "because, of course, that would cut into how much money team owners, etc., can make. Such a noble game!" And how exactly does ignoring safety measures cost owners money? What, you think fans are gonna stop coming to the game because of less big hits? Fans are WAY more likely to stop coming to games because a player is injured and out for the season. NOBODY, whether on this forum or anywhere, is arguing that maiming should be a part of the NFL. Players have been getting fined for YEARS for unnecessary hits. American football riots hardly EVER happen. Being a huge NFL fan, who lives in the USA, I can assure you that American football fans are far less rowdy than soccer fans. Soccer fans are portrayed as hooligans because a lot of them are. Throwing stuff all over the field, starting racist chants (happened recently, i forget who was playing), violence in the stands, etc. These things are 100 times worse in soccer than football. |
Vegangelica's Rules For The Future World:
The above are a small portion of the changes that will be made to your lives. No longer will there be a society that charts its own course. The course of society will be charted for you, and static in all regards. There will be no future apart from maintaining the present. Deviation from this will result in strict, harsh punishment. May we all live unhappily equal lives. |
So....because I eat seafood, I support the death of men at sea who catch crabs, right?
You're whole view is that of a VERY slippery slope |
:rofl: @ Freebase
|
:bowdown: :laughing:
That's the best post I've ever read on this site and this best thing I have read anywhere in a long, long time! :beer: |
I don't support taking the hits out of football, but everytime I hear Troy Aiman or Steve Young talk, it's pretty pathetic. They're both semi-retarded from from multiple concussions they've had from the game, and that's sad.
Bottom line, it's American Football, one of the most dangerous sports in the world. If we take the hard hitting tough guys out, it will just be soccer except you can carry and throw the ball. How is it that the NFL has made it nearly 100 years playing the most barbaric sport on the planet and head injuries are being addressed only now? I say, players aren't as tough as they once were. How about instead of changing the rules, you recruit and sign tougher players? There would be no such thing as a defenseless receiver if the receiver was equally as big and strong as the person hitting them. If these players can't take a hit, maybe they should switch to Baseball, or Soccer. |
Quote:
Saying football is the most barbaric sport in the world is a little far-fetched, and in my opinion any movement away from physicality in sports is a bastardization of competitive play. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 AM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.