|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Are you satisfied with your gender? | |||
Yes | 84 | 69.42% | |
No | 14 | 11.57% | |
Not sure | 23 | 19.01% | |
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-03-2010, 09:09 AM | #591 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,578
|
Quote:
|
|
08-03-2010, 09:24 AM | #592 (permalink) | |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Quote:
But too often men judge women's femininity incorrectly, confusing real manliness with simply having things that are associated with manliness. Confusing corelation with with cause. The idea that being fit and physical is purely a guy thing is thankfully slipping a little from public conscious. Excercise and other things increase testosterone levels for both sexes, there's absolutely no reason why women shouldn't do it other than to fit with the ideal of the delicate woman. Something that women now have the choice to be or not. Things are more challenging though for women who don't want to be daint and delicate and want to compete with men on a physical level. Fit women are still a little weaker than fit guys, but what's with so many guys hyperboling how terrible at sports women are? They're not terrible at sports at all, men have a physical strength advantage yes. But not being the absolute best =/= terrible. And comparing the opposite sex in that way is totally f*cking unfair anyway. An fit woman will best an unfit man. And athletic women would could kick the sh*t of the kinda delicate women guys idealize about. I'm not a fit or physical guy at all and I guess the bros can joke about how my thing for athletic girls is yet another sign of my repressed homosexality because I'd rather be submissive than dominant or whatever. The idea that men have to be sexually dominant and women have to be sexually submissive is also very outdated. |
|
08-03-2010, 09:31 AM | #593 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: East Bay, CA
Posts: 127
|
Quote:
I think our ideas of gender need to be challenged every once in a while, but I really can't be bitchy to anyone who decides to be "feminine", for two reasons. One, it's an individual choice. Two, I've decided to be "feminine" already by painting my nails, shaving, plucking my eyebrows, and wearing makeup. I don't think I could **** up and embrace the patriarchy any more in the eyes of the radicals.
__________________
You're not punk, and I'm telling everyone. ____ last.fm ____ "Give a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. But, set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life." - Terry Pratchett |
|
08-03-2010, 10:02 AM | #594 (permalink) | ||
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Quote:
Quote:
First of all, patriacy is NOT an enforced system anymore, not in this country, except in the most conservative religious communities, which thankfully more and more people today are critical of and people now have the right to defect from these communities without severe punishment. Except closed communities who have their own laws and can banish anyone who chooses not to follow them, I few bad for the people who get born into those. Second, being very feminine in your appearance and interests does not mean you are submissive to men and giving in to the oppression of females. And third. The problem with every revolutionary movement and counter culture is that while they claim to oppose conformity, they really don't. They dislike the current social doctrines yes, but they don't dislike the overall idea of having a social order, they still want to make their own beliefs into social doctrine. And once they succeed they have simply replaced the old oppressers but they end up being just as bad in the end. Pretty much the big problem I have with radical feminism and any radical movement. Even the Nazi party fought social order before becoming the social order themselves. That's an extreme comparison but my point is that radicalism is dangerous in any context. Last edited by boo boo; 08-03-2010 at 10:16 AM. |
||
08-03-2010, 11:28 AM | #595 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Anyway, I think radical feminists fail to understand that looking feminism is a choice women should still have, even after it's no longer something that is enforced on the populice, and men shouldn't be demonized for what they find attractive.
I still prefer women not look like dudes, and I prefer them to shave their body hair. But that's only an aesthetic and sexual preference and not something I want to be enforced. There are still parts of the world where women are forced into a lot of things and treated like absolute crap. But in America, for the most part anyway, women are no longer burdened in that way and the worst they have to deal with is dirty looks, mean comments and less guys who are attracted to them, and sometimes it can make finding a job more difficult than it would be if you fit the ideal image. Those are things you will have to cope with. Many women are brave enough to cope with it. But the idea that if a woman chooses to be trendy and feminine looking that means she's weak is very offensive to me. They are aware that they have the choice to be other things but that is what they choose because it's their right to choose it. As long as certain feminists ignore that aspect of reality and keep bastardizing the word "slave" by applying it to women who choose to look a certain way, they will forever be my arch nemesis. Last edited by boo boo; 08-03-2010 at 12:21 PM. |
08-03-2010, 11:34 PM | #596 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Women and Sports | This Hot Fire
This is like the most sexist thing I have ever read. People like this breed you know, think about that for a moment but not for too long or you will kill yourself. |
08-04-2010, 02:22 AM | #597 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eureka, CA
Posts: 87
|
I am happy being a man. Socially and physically.
Though men seem to usually want sex more, women do seem to enjoy it most. Thats ok with me, too. I love helping them enjoy it. I used to be attracted to athletic women, but it turns out having sex with them is like being with a meat robot. Now I prefer a durable but softer, bendier female. In fact, within the last month I have broken up with my previous girl of 2 years and started with a new/old girl I once dated for 2 years long ago. I am in love. I walk around grinning like an idiot. She is everything I'm not, but also like me in ways that make us compatible. We each know and are comfortable in our position like 2 puzzle pieces. Sometimes she is so admirable of me and helpful and sweet, sometimes she is clearly smarter than me and forceful and on point. The parts I don't understand about her make me want her more, even though it seems like it might be foolish to do so. If I were a social or physical female, this reality would never happen. I would have no access to this, and it is the first time in my life I am completely in love without that little something in the back of my mind. She would not magnet toward me like she does. So, I like and will stick to being a man in physical and social ways. |
08-04-2010, 03:33 AM | #598 (permalink) | |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Quote:
Also if you're a lesbian, finding beautiful women isn't unobtainable, it's more challenging yes. But yeah what I like most about being male is having the right tools to plese girls. Only I never use them so I have nothing to be happy about. |
|
08-04-2010, 06:58 AM | #599 (permalink) | |||
Facilitator
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where people kill 30 million pigs per year
Posts: 2,014
|
Quote:
Expectations for women to be submissive and men to be dominant are definitely societally based. The status of women in the Western world has been rising drastically in just several generations, and this is hardly due to genetic changes! Also, studies have shown repeatedly that people treat babies differently based on what they have been told about the child's gender: they offer different toys to them (doll to girl; car to boy), and even have more physical contact (cuddling, etc.) with girls than with boys. I recall a relative, whose 2-year-old girl wore mostly pink clothes, saying, "I have such a girly girl! She likes all girly things!" I thought to myself, "Are you blind?!? Your daughter didn't go out and buy her own clothes, her own toys!" I think people are often unaware of all the ways they treat girls/boys differently. I was lucky to be raised by parents who didn't enforce gender concepts on me. I made mud bombs, played in forts, had toy animals, had toy cars and trains, and a tutu and dress-up clothes...and I was never made to feel bad about any of my likes by my parents. I was lucky. I grew up without stereotypes. I've said it many times before here on MB: gender should NOT be a straight-jacket. I suspect that whatever genetic predispositions boys and girls have toward different behaviors, they are dwarfed by the huge effect of culture. Quote:
and yet you also say that if they DON'T choose to appear "feminine" then "they will deal with dirty looks, mean comments and less guys who are attracted to them, and sometimes it can make finding a job more difficult than it would be if you fit the ideal image." I disagree with you that many people are strong enough to willingly go through life dealing with constant dirty looks, mean comments, and problems finding jobs and mates. I feel you underestimate the strength of peer pressure and the FEAR people have of not conforming. The fear of being outcast, especially when this may affect your potential for getting work and financial stability and a mate, is HUGE. The enormous and damaging power of peer pressure on people's choices is obvious when we look through history. Women used to wear corsets, and they EMBRACED this trend for years, admiring and purchasing corsets even though wearing them harmed their health. Chinese mothers crippled their own girls' feet permanently through footbinding, an excruciating procedure, to make the girls appear "attractive" to ensure they could marry well and have financial stability and high social rank. Many women throughout the world, especially in Africa, STILL mutilate their little girls' genitals severely, in order to make them appear "attractive." And many men and women in the U.S. today mutilate their little BOYS' genitals so that they "look like their father" and so their penises are "more attractive." All to conform to gender stereotypes and strong social pressures. And the scary thing is, the people who inflicted all these bodily changes on themselves and others did so thinking they were making a good and healthy, reasonable choice. I feel it is logical to conclude that modern women in the Western world, who are choosing to wear make-up (often containing toxic compounds), shave huge portions of their bodies, wear damaging high-heels shoes, or wear skirts that reduce their freedom of motion, are also succumbing to the same type of peer pressure that has pressured people for centuries to do unnecessary and often harmful things to their own bodies in order to "fit in," and yet feel psychologically that they are doing these actions voluntarily for good reasons. I feel most men abide by their own "male" rules for similar reasons.
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
08-04-2010, 07:30 AM | #600 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Fair enough but lets not compare legshaving to corsets. Legshaving has it's discomforts as does any kind of self grooming (something everybody is expected to do) but it's not really hazardous to do it.
You take a look at the cultural diversity of today, people with crazy fashion sense and weird fetishes that they are open about. Very few people give in to peer pressure as much as we did in the old days, at least once we reach adulthood and school life is done and over with and we have more freedoms. Lets be honest, the amount of people who get dirty looks is starting to equal if not outnumber the amount of people who don't. We're so overally critical on one hand and yet so many people don't give a f*ck on the other. When neo hippie-ism and feminism is very trendy now I don't think hairy legged girls are unable to find acceptence if they look for people who accept it. Theres so many cultures people choose to associate themselves with, if you don't like how one culture treats you, make a lifestyle change and find people who don't care how hairy you are. I think most people in America have progressed to the point of accepting that everyone has their own tastes, that somebody out there will ALWAYS disaprove of their lifestyle choice and that there's no reason to care what these people think. If people care what perfect strangers think about their fashion sense then I think they have problems. The only people whose opinions should matter to you are your family and your friends, and if they are your true friends they won't care what is on your legs. I just don't think it's as big of a deal anymore. I think now it's because women have done it for so long that many women actually have come to prefer it. And many men prefer smooth legs and if people want to base their appearances on attracting the opposite sex (something we both do) then that's their right and it's something that is biologically natural for us. Even if it's made us to adopt things you deem unnatural, we have the choice to do whatever we want to our bodies regardless if it's natural or not. The more common something is the more people will eventually come to like it, our ideals of beauty change as times change. It's not like most women WANT to be hairy but feel forced to shave it off. I think most women do it because it pleases their own aesthetic taste. But here's some advice. Anyone can start a new trend I think. I don't think preaching on a forum like this one is the way to start a trend. If you're too self conscious or whatever to make a fashion statement yourself then I dunno, maybe try and start a (non sleazy) magazine or website that challenges ideals of feminine beauty and promotes alternatives. I'm following my own advice in fact, because baldy1388 has appointed me as a contributor to his blog The Acomo File, which he says actually get a decent amount of hits in the one month it's been around. So now I can share my opinions with people who are actually interested instead of constantly bumping some thread that only 2 other people ever read. Last edited by boo boo; 08-04-2010 at 07:36 AM. |
|