Is Planet X/Nibiru Real?

Sljslj · 06-03-2010, 05:23 PM

So I've been looking into this on and off for the past few weeks and I'm almost sold on it.
If you don't know, Nibiru is the name given to the supposed 10th planet that comes into our solar system every 3,600 years and will be visible in the winter solstice of 2012.
There's alot of photographic "proof" of Nibiru's existance and some of it seemingly can't be disproven. There is a photo in which you can see it, appearing as a "double sunrise". While most photos like this can be discredited as a glare from the sun, this one dos not fall into that category as you can also see the reflection of this object on a body of water below.
I remain skeptical and would not be surprised if this was completely fake, but it is interesting nonetheless.
If you'd like to see the picture: SIGNS of the TIMES to January 13, 2006 it is #1527.

simplephysics · 06-03-2010, 05:30 PM

I don't know much about Nibiru, but I couldn't imagine any space program announcing the discovery of a new planet if they weren't completely sure of its existence.. and besides, what would possibly motivate them to lie about something of the sorts?

GuitarBizarre · 06-03-2010, 05:32 PM

They told us pluto isn't a planet, on account of its eccentric orbit and tiny size, why would we suddenly announce a planet with even more bizarre features is part of this solar system?

On top of that, who gives a ****? Its not like there aren't millions upon billions of planets around, and theres more than a few space objects that orbit our solar system or sun or even the earth itself.

Totally of no consequence.

Sljslj · 06-03-2010, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dreadnaught

I don't know much about Nibiru, but I couldn't imagine any space program announcing the discovery of a new planet if they weren't completely sure of its existence.. and besides, what would possibly motivate them to lie about something of the sorts?

well, conspiracy theorists think NASA and other orginizations are trying to hide the "impending doom" of 2012, with which Nibiru is closely associated.

Sljslj · 06-03-2010, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GuitarBizarre

They told us pluto isn't a planet, on account of its eccentric orbit and tiny size, why would we suddenly announce a planet with even more bizarre features is part of this solar system?

On top of that, who gives a ****? Its not like there aren't millions upon billions of planets around, and theres more than a few space objects that orbit our solar system or sun or even the earth itself.

Totally of no consequence.

Those who support the idea of it's existance say it has similar conditions to Earth and possibly even intelligent life. So if that is true, it's not just another space object. As I said before, I am skeptical, but wouldn't it be fantastic if this planet did reveal itself as a home to intelligent life in 2012?

simplephysics · 06-03-2010, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sljslj

well, conspiracy theorists think NASA and other orginizations are trying to hide the "impending doom" of 2012, with which Nibiru is closely associated.

We all gonna die!

mr dave · 06-03-2010, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sljslj

well, conspiracy theorists think NASA and other orginizations are trying to hide the "impending doom" of 2012, with which Nibiru is closely associated.

conspiracy theorists are also afraid of holding down a real job, paying back debts, recognizing associated costs for anything manufactured, and most of all taking personal responsibility.

Dreadnaught is spot on - We all gonna die! it's true. eventually we all do, it's something average normal people come to terms with in their late teens early 20s. facing and addressing one's mortality is a necessary step in mental maturity. it's one of many internal demon's that need to be cleaned on our paths so we can keep taking steps forward. CTs don't take steps forward, they stall along the path and start obsessing on their direct environment then try to get anyone close to them to stop progressing so they can validate their choice to stagnate without taking responsibility for it since someone else is doing it along with them. so it can't totally be wrong, right?

conspiracy theorists have also started dropping dates in early 2013 for when the 'real' changes will be occurring since it only 'starts' in 2012 and most people won't actually notice the subtle changes starting up until a few months later. sure seems like a handy dandy little backdoor to save face when nothing actually happens. wasn't technology supposed to cease working about 10 years ago? Y2K and all...

CanwllCorfe · 06-04-2010, 12:31 AM

Y2K was when I began to hate and dispell any possible conspiracy theories. I was a vexed and terrified 9 year old all for nothing.

noise · 06-04-2010, 02:23 AM

i've got ties with the Zetas. apparently they can't stop the collision from taking place (actually early next year, the Mayans were bad at math), but they have already moved most of the population of Nibiru to a planet near Betelgeuse. they're taking some humans along too, and i'm on the VIP list

Sljslj · 06-04-2010, 12:00 PM

Don't get me wrong, I don't necessarily believe in this, I just thought that "double sunrise" was interesting. So let's assume (assume makes an 'ass' out of 'u' and 'me', funny saying, but so true) that the photo that is on the link is not photo-shoped or anything, does anyone know of a logical, scientific reason why there would appear to be two suns?

06-03-2010, 05:23 PM	#1 (permalink)
Sljslj The Omniscient Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Reno, Nevada, USA Posts: 998	Is Planet X/Nibiru Real? So I've been looking into this on and off for the past few weeks and I'm almost sold on it. If you don't know, Nibiru is the name given to the supposed 10th planet that comes into our solar system every 3,600 years and will be visible in the winter solstice of 2012. There's alot of photographic "proof" of Nibiru's existance and some of it seemingly can't be disproven. There is a photo in which you can see it, appearing as a "double sunrise". While most photos like this can be discredited as a glare from the sun, this one dos not fall into that category as you can also see the reflection of this object on a body of water below. I remain skeptical and would not be surprised if this was completely fake, but it is interesting nonetheless. If you'd like to see the picture: SIGNS of the TIMES to January 13, 2006 it is #1527.

06-04-2010, 12:31 AM	#8 (permalink)
CanwllCorfe Quiet Man in the Corner Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Pocono Mountains Posts: 2,480	Y2K was when I began to hate and dispell any possible conspiracy theories. I was a vexed and terrified 9 year old all for nothing. __________________ Your eyes were never yet let in to see the majesty and riches of the mind, but dwell in darkness; for your God is blind.

06-04-2010, 02:23 AM	#9 (permalink)
noise thirsty ears Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Boulder Posts: 742	i've got ties with the Zetas. apparently they can't stop the collision from taking place (actually early next year, the Mayans were bad at math), but they have already moved most of the population of Nibiru to a planet near Betelgeuse. they're taking some humans along too, and i'm on the VIP list __________________ my flac collection

06-04-2010, 12:00 PM	#10 (permalink)
Sljslj The Omniscient Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Reno, Nevada, USA Posts: 998	Don't get me wrong, I don't necessarily believe in this, I just thought that "double sunrise" was interesting. So let's assume (assume makes an 'ass' out of 'u' and 'me', funny saying, but so true) that the photo that is on the link is not photo-shoped or anything, does anyone know of a logical, scientific reason why there would appear to be two suns? __________________ MY LYRICS Last edited by Sljslj; 06-04-2010 at 05:37 PM.