|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-04-2010, 09:11 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The flatlands
Posts: 58
|
Entertaining YouTube Arguments
(the video itself isn't particularly funny aside from the wrestlers that pop up between lyrics, so, new thread)
I'm sure there are serious, meaningful discussions that take place in YouTube video comments. But who cares about those? Here we have a video uploaded in 2008, that is the subject of heated debate to this day: Apparently it is obviously Linkin Park singing, and it is also obviously Trapt singing. Browsing through the comments of this and a similar upload, they seem to be just about evenly split between the camps - it is positively, without a doubt, Trapt. Or Linkin Park. And anyone who says otherwise is a noob/idiot/DOUMBASS. The song itself is either better because it's Linkin Park, better because it's Trapt, much worse because it's Linkin Park, "almost identical" because it's Trapt, or simply "fake" without further speculation. Clearly Linkin Park - I mean Trapt - I mean Linkin Park - I mean Trapt - has a very unique sound. What's your favorite YouTube feud? |
04-05-2010, 02:40 PM | #3 (permalink) |
Dazed and confuzzled
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: England
Posts: 1,552
|
To be fair on YouTube, the same crappy arguments appear here. Mention any sub-genre and then everyone starts getting picky and argumentative.
__________________
I have acquired four score and nineteen difficulties, but a wench cannot be counted among them |
04-05-2010, 04:30 PM | #4 (permalink) | |
Quiet Man in the Corner
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Pocono Mountains
Posts: 2,480
|
Quote:
Really? I haven't seen that.. but then again I only pay attention to certain sections. |
|
|