"Poor people smell, Big3 said"

^ If it was actually said, wouldn't that be correct?

No10 is wrong Tore. Jackhammer doesn't like Britney Spears whatsoever!

I think it depend on the situation. If you are using "whose buttocks I waxed" as way identifying the guy, as in, "not the guy who came in for a mani/pedi", then commas aren't necessary. If you've previously established the identity, and "whose buttocks I waxed' is an aside to provide supplementary or gratuitous information, then the use of commas to form a parenthetical phrase is appropriate.

If someone said Big3 said it, yes.

But if someone is telling you that Big3 said it, then no.

I.e. is it first hand or second hand information?

That was my point.
Obviously, if it reads like this; "Poor people smell, Big3 said". It's correct to assume it's second hand information. Meaning the punctuation is good.

Edit: Do me a favour and click on my sig to join The Green & Gold Revolution. :D

o-k, did someone say it was wrong? Tell me what I'm missing here.

Didn't 333 assume it was wrong?

And what have you got against poor people Brennan?

1. I don't read what 333 says.

2. I hate my own.

Seems to me that if it's a quoted response, it should read like this:

Q: "What did Big3 say?"
A: He said; "Poor people smell." OR "Poor people smell."
The tricky one is: "Big3 said poor people smell." because it seems redundant in context with the Q... but I don't think it's correct, as a quoted response, to write "Poor people smell, Big3 said".

The only scenario I've seen with regard for the way Tore presented it was in it's actual proper narrative form: "Poor people smell.", Big3 said.
You usually see this in any literature where the narrator is quoting. The narrator doesn't quote his narration, therefore the quotations surround only the quote, and the comma separates the quote from the narration.

Here's Tore's original post;

1. Why? Is she poor?
2. Every home should have one!