It's very telling that there was both a men's and women's version of this thread, originally. Yet only the women's version survived, on a site that is drowning in sausage.

Quite frankly, the men of this site bare a collective responsibility for letting these hoes run buck wild.

It's more telling that the version "for girls" is only for straight girls.

What exactly does that tell us?

The lesbos aren't real girls.

For all our lesbian posters!

https://ugc.reveliststatic.com/gen/c...rnmgc2qbwe.png

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xzni3lxQo...21275392_n.jpg

yeah bruh let's take this thread back for the carpet munchers

Damn right. Especially since none of the regular posting girls are completely straight, I think.
I don't find that girl super attractive, because of the amount of make up and the look in her eyes, but she's good looking of course

What about her though?

https://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/aLgPMV5_700b.jpg

She's attractive. (Although her head looks a bit small for her body)

I think it's more that she has a longish neck and steep... collarbone/shoulder action (whatever that's called). Honestly I'd describe the whole thing as "swanish" and I'm kinda sprung about it. The massive rack doesn't hurt.