Tell your editor to suck a fat dick.

I'm a tad bit peeved at it as well because it's a pretty misleading title that I wasn't really looking to provide. Not to mention I proofread the article time and time again, and the mistake still went through.

Oh well.

They can't all be zingers, but I think you're taking that phrase too literally by going for zero zingers total.

Well no, but it seems rather pointless to proofread my articles when mistakes get through anyway. That's more what I'm getting at.

You gotta work on your reading skills man.

Excel is a well-oiled machine. No WD-40 required.

Pretty sure there are more jobs than graphic design that require knowledge of Excel and its advanced features (not just photo imaging). I already made that point to you. You made an issue of this benign situation from the beginning, not me, so I was just explaining it to you as a courtesy.

Excel has certainly allowed Aux-In Airlines the breadth, depth and freedom to be on autopilot (after manual entries) in multiple facets of life. It is Washington's John Adams, no matter the coordinates or the destination. No matter the relevancy of Chenopodium quinoa or that of the Oryza glaberrima. No matter the flow from the bursting riverbanks of Macular Degeneration, or that of the shuttered rigs of exploration from the deepest of seas.

Excel is the treasure trove. It is the GPS. It is the protector. It is the lamp on at night.

Edit: ****!!!

What do you mean?

If you proofread something a bunch of times and there are still mistakes, you ain't no proofreader boy.

I read it over time and time again and the section in question was not the way it shows up on the finished product. I know that for a fact because I have the saved text backed up and it's without error.