“Britain is ready for a fascist leader…I think Britain could benefit from a fascist leader. After all, fascism is really nationalism…I believe very strongly in fascism, people have always responded with greater efficiency under a regimental leadership.”

have fun living under a dictatorship :*

For all the Sex Pistols lyrics this is clearly the one that should rule the human race.

I feel this so much but god damn do you all make it so miserable to realize it.

sex pistols were a bunch of losers anyway

I mean if you're a trendy **** who thinks they were a punk boy band then yeah, but otherwise you'd be intelligent.

i dont wanna be intelligent so **** u

I'd say congrats but I assume your dad beat me to it.

my dad doesn't come home, bitch

I wonder why.

bitch

i'm the best son ever

i never leave my room i just listen to nasheeds and watch porn all day

I'm the same son tbh. I watch Game Grumps and listen to racist punk all day.

#metoo

Wrestling and Tropical Fuck Storm all day

ahhh i recently discovered game grumps like two weeks ago and i think its my favorite thing ever

Bro. Bro. I don't know if you know about early Game Grumps with Jontron but it's far superior to later Game Grumps. The Sonic 06 playthrough of over a hundred videos is basically the best thing ever.

Egoraptor and Jontron together is more energy than you know what to do with. I'm coincidentally watching it for the third time atm and it's still amazing.

no i haven't, i've only seen their recent stuff but i'll most definitely check it out bc i love them

also i just submitted the worst piece of **** i've ever written in my life and i dont even feel bad/??????????????????

Unless you're becoming a writer then who cares so long as you pass?

rip

I know we have this idea that you should never put your hands on a child, but children are not innocent, are not delicate chandeliers, and are not our beautiful future. The same children we cooed over as babies and six-year-olds can grow up to be Nazis, wife beaters, and Nickelback members. At some point when one obviously has a severe mood or personality disorder that you can't reason with using, "We don't do that, Jimmy, we use our words", that little **** could do with getting grabbed by the throat and thrown to the ground like the bitch he is.

Who knows, he'll probably never be anything but a piece of **** who'll be society's problem when he's an adult, but just maybe he'll think twice about throwing hands against somebody he thinks won't fight back after this, so that at least we won't have to tolerate his being a ****ing psychopathic bully (probably won't make a difference tho tbh). The dude getting assaulted is patient as **** but god damn unless you're MLK there's no way 95% of us wouldn't do the exact same thing or quite possibly even worse.

I hope in ten years this kid does something dumb enough to get thrown in prison for half his life just so nobody but people who'll be happy to break the bones in his face have to deal with him. He is not our future and if he is then bring on the nuclear apocalypse.

Kids a little ****, but I can't get behind this guy doing that to him. You treat him like you would an adult, by protecting yourself and calling the cops.

Youre a pompous ass.

Youre a pompous ass.

You think youre better than us?

**** you you dirty whore is a pretty good line tho

I've been gone a week, a month, a month and a ½.

I understand that, but if you're getting consistently punched and berated by a kid who apparently got into this **** by vandalizing cars and possibly your car, could you honestly say you wouldn't just lose it for five seconds, just five seconds, five seconds that involved grabbing a kid by the throat who'd probably be the first in line to join the SS just for the social status boost?

I mean how do you protect yourself? The dude walked away and got followed. And not just followed but confronted directly to the face by the most egregious disrespect anyone could be expected to deal with short of a government hearing about your communist ties. I wouldn't respect someone for getting violent towards that kind of aggression no matter who it was, but I definitely can't fault him for losing it for just five seconds. He didn't even pursue the attack, and maybe because he was just scared of the legal fallout, but he still got a hold of himself. He wasn't out of control and abusive, he was just understandably irate. I think I might have just repeatedly knocked the kid in the mouth with full force until I saw his teeth on the ground and blood in his mouth.

Now I'm a bad person but god damn it would be difficult to talk myself down from that.

Yes, I'm ridiculously emotionless under most circumstances.

The kid was not a threat. You protect yourself the way he did until the moment he threw the kid to the ground.

If you could do that then I commend you, but I suspect you'd be one in a hundred.

For me, It's the principle. When you're a kid, you can't be expected to have learned how to be yet and you can't be held entirely responsible. The idea is that when you reach some, perhaps arbitrary age, you're now responsible and supposed to know how to behave, whether you actually do or not.

I support the idea, but it's hard to say when exactly people should be required to take responsibility for their own behaviour for good.

I'm not saying a horribly annoying little **** wouldn't make it hard to insist on the principle.

I totally understand what you're saying, and he definitely did "control" himself for the most part. The kid definitely has some issues though.

Kid across the street from me has some anger problems as well. I hear him telling his parents to "Fuck off" and other such nonsense when he's riding his bike in the street. It just seems like a lot more than a kid being a twat kind of scenario.

That is not an annoying little ****. I might be just intolerant but that kid looks unsaveable. Until the kid got thrown to the ground and started screaming bloody murder I could have bought that he was just misguided, but at that point it was clear that he was never truly out of control, he just didn't give a **** about being in control. At that point his entire modus operandi was ruining someone's life and if he had I can imagine the evil smirk on his face. The kid is scum and if the dude had shot him in the head he would have been a psychopath himself but at least we'd have one less other psychopath.

That's where the principle takes over. He will be given the benefit of the doubt until he's legal age. Then he's on his own and deserves to be squashed by the hammer of life if he continues inviting it.

I'd certainly never want to work with troubled youngsters myself, but I have a lot of respect for people who do manage to tap that endless well of patience.

Kid wants to start swinging, acting like a big man treat him like one.

Why would you give him the benefit of the doubt? Is there some reason you saw in him that made you think he had potential or are you just clinging to mindless liberalism that says you should never touch a child under any circumstances because physical discipline against children by parents has been shown to be ineffective?

That kid looked about five years from everyone on Earth, liberal or not, deciding that he was a waste of skin. I'm just being proactive.

Who knows why he's acting like that. Maybe he's just a ****stain. Maybe he's mentally ill and needs help. Maybe his dad is sodomizing him every night and he's just acting out his pain. Who knows. He's a kid, so I have to insist on forgiveness. Feel free to piledrive him into the pavement a few years from now, guilt free. But right now, it's the principle thing again. I'm sure you think I'm irrational and maybe you're right. But I believe in showing peole some amount of good will.

The kid would probably batter you anyway Charles.

Yeah this.

:D