|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
![]()
here's my homework:
What is the Fourier series for the following system: y(II) + y = 0 y(0) = 0 y(pi) = 0 see if you can do it guys! i'll post answers later! lol, lock.
__________________
first.am |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: lorain,ohio
Posts: 909
|
![]()
*cough*
This list includes the squares of 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 19, and 63.) These numbers are the result of a progressive sieve, analogous to the prime sieve. For example, every term greater than 10 must not be divisible by 2, because otherwise it would give an integer N for (3K-10)/2 based on the pair 1,-3. Likewise from the pair 2,-2 we see that every term greater than 8 must not be congruent to 2 modulo 3, because otherwise it would give an integer N for (4K-8)/3. Here is a short table of the expressions that must not be integers for sufficiently large "prime K" values -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 1 - (2K-5)/1 (3K-10)/2 ( 4K-17)/ 3 ( 5K-26)/ 4 2 (4K-8)/3 (6K-13)/5 ( 8K-20)/ 7 (10K-29)/ 9 3 (9K-18)/8 (12K-25)/11 (15K-34)/14 4 (16K-32)/15 (20K-41)/19 5 (25K-50)/24 In each case the expression (AK-B)/(A-1) implies that for K values greater than B we must exclude those such that K = B (mod A-1). In other words, the sieve excludes every number greater than q = x^2 + y^2 congruent to q mod (xy-1). *cough* |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Something Completely Different |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
![]()
nominal & ordinal differential equations. this concept is actually not that hard to grasp, basically transforms any function into a sine & cosine infinite series. it's still pretty hard to figure out what the series is, but that just goes back to calc II.
and Seltzer, aren't you a comp e major? i expect you'll have to get way more in depth than this. i'm only 12 credits away from a math minor myself, but i'm not exactly looking forward to statistical analysis (or whatever it's called over there). edit: dac you may not have to take this part. at my school some of the engineering majors only have to cover the first part of the course. likewise i didn't have to take all of calc III.
__________________
first.am |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) | |
MB's Biggest Fanboy
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 2,852
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) | |
Fish in the percolator!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hobbit Land NZ
Posts: 2,870
|
![]() Quote:
Software engineering has very little use for calculus (I pretty much left it behind after my general first year). Instead it relies on pure maths, linear algebra, logic, algorithmics, graph theory and statistics. I'm not really liking the stats I've done so far, but I think it becomes more interesting when mixed with other fields (i.e. combinatorics and stochastics). I am wishing I'd chosen a double major with maths though.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|