The Sexual Experience Thread

[Guybrush]

Originally Posted by storymilo

tbf tore..... there's hardly a fucking difference. I don't understand why some people make some huge differentiation or judgement between penises based on whether they're missing some skin on the end. It's still the same part....

This isn't to say I think there's no difference (obviously there is, one has the freaking tip of it cut off) but like.... does it really matter?

Since I like the vajayjay, I wouldn't know so I'm not gonna argue with you there. Paloma seems to prefer them cut, though.

[storymilo]

ha. It's not like I'm an expert of penises, but my dad is circumcised and I don't understand why it matters...hm. Course, I don't really like ****s cut or uncut so maybe I'm biased...

[Guybrush]

I assume ibeing circumcised generally decreases sexual pleasure because the penis helmet becomes less sensitive. It's important to remember that foreskins are something we evolved, so they do have function. It's not just a skin cap.

However, I am prepared to accept that compared to female circumcision, schlong cutting may be trivial.

I'm still waiting for Vegangelica's essay on the subject, though.

[mr dave]

Originally Posted by tore

I assume ibeing circumcised generally decreases sexual pleasure because the penis helmet becomes less sensitive.

being cut = lasting longer.

[Rickenbacker]

Originally Posted by storymilo

my dad is circumcised

Wonder how you found that out...

[Barnard17]

Originally Posted by storymilo

ha. It's not like I'm an expert of penises, but my dad is circumcised and I don't understand why it matters...hm. Course, I don't really like ****s cut or uncut so maybe I'm biased...

I'm not intrinsically against cutting. If someone has phimosis or is incapable of cleaning properly when they shower it can be beneficial. Some people get circumcised when they're older because it reveals more of the head and increases sensitivity. I'm primarily against cutting children and babies for religious and cultural reasons because they have no choice in the subject. And that's a part of them. You wouldn't cut off someone's hand at 8 days old and say "it's fine, God told me to lol". I see it as no different. Certainly not as severe as female circumcision but still a disgusting tradition. Long term as well if you get the snip when you're a baby you'll be less sensitive due to being used to friction.

[Guybrush]

Originally Posted by Barnard17

Some people get circumcised when they're older because it reveals more of the head and increases sensitivity.

How do you figure this? The average non-cut penis has the head covered fully or partly by the foreskin except when it's erect. When you're not excited, the most sensitive part of the schlong is protected and when you are, it's not. Any concern about sensitivity tends to lean towards the notion that circumcision leads to desensitized schlongs. From Wikipedia's article on the subject :

Originally Posted by The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), 2007

The effect of circumcision on penile sensation or sexual satisfaction is unknown. Because the epithelium of a circumcised glans becomes cornified, and because some feel nerve over-stimulation leads to desensitization, many believe that the glans of a circumcised penis is less sensitive.

[Freebase Dali]

Originally Posted by tore

How do you figure this? The average non-cut penis has the head covered fully or partly by the foreskin except when it's erect. When you're not excited, the most sensitive part of the schlong is protected and when you are, it's not. Any concern about sensitivity tends to lean towards the notion that circumcision leads to desensitized schlongs. From Wikipedia's article on the subject :

That's most certainly true.
I'm not cut, but when I was younger and my junk started growing, the skin literally was no longer able to fit over the head anymore, even flacid, not even half way. (Which I don't know if that's normal or not...) The head used to be sensitive as hell, but after a while, it having been exposed as though it was cut and constantly rubbing on my clothes, there was no longer any sensitivity.
Now days, the head has the same sensitivity as any other part of the top of my wang.

It's a weird scenario for me, because when I'm erect, it looks as though I'm cut.
And when I'm not, it's just like...wtf... not serving a purpose.

[adidasss]

Wow, that's certainly weird. Are you absolutely certain you're not a victim of a botched circumcision?

[333]

Originally Posted by Freebase Dali

That's most certainly true.
I'm not cut, but when I was younger and my junk started growing, the skin literally was no longer able to fit over the head anymore, even flacid, not even half way. (Which I don't know if that's normal or not...) The head used to be sensitive as hell, but after a while, it having been exposed as though it was cut and constantly rubbing on my clothes, there was no longer any sensitivity.
Now days, the head has the same sensitivity as any other part of the top of my wang.

It's a weird scenario for me, because when I'm erect, it looks as though I'm cut.
And when I'm not, it's just like...wtf... not serving a purpose.

I think this may be normal. I'm not a guy, but a guy I've been with who is cut said he had to pull his skin back because like you said, "it didn't fit over the head". Because no one really explained to him, he thought it was weird, but since then I've talked to many guys who had to do this. The one I was with looked like he was cut when he was hard and when he was not hard, he looked uncircumcised. Is this not normal? I've been with three guys whose penises work like this ..