|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-25-2009, 01:27 AM | #41 (permalink) |
Al Dente
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,708
|
Think of it this way (i know i'm contradicting my earlier posts) The study really doesn't show any cause and effect evidence. Maybe being really intelligent makes you want to listen to Beethoven, and not the other way around.
Think about it people who are pompously self-aware of their own IQ level are going to listen to music that they associate with their own genius. "my friends all listen to indie rock music, but i'm gifted so I listen to the beethoven that my yuppie over-achiever parents have been cramming down my throat since I was in the womb". something like that......or not. |
03-25-2009, 01:30 AM | #42 (permalink) | |
Master, We Perish
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Havin a good time, rollin to the bottom.
Posts: 3,710
|
That's how I see it. I'm sure there's plenty of smart people who listen to Lil Wayne or TI or Nickelback and still stay smart.
__________________
Quote:
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits Spoiler for guess what:
|
|
03-25-2009, 01:34 AM | #44 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
So Jazz fans are generally more stupid than fans of Disturbed?
I'm pretty sure a critical error was made here, unless this includes smooth jazz. Also, if Sufjan Stevens is music for smart people then I take pride in being stupid. |
03-25-2009, 01:37 AM | #45 (permalink) | |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
Quote:
|
|
03-25-2009, 01:42 AM | #46 (permalink) | |
Master, We Perish
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Havin a good time, rollin to the bottom.
Posts: 3,710
|
No, there's such a thing as an intelligent person having bad taste in music.
__________________
Quote:
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits Spoiler for guess what:
Last edited by Surell; 03-25-2009 at 09:37 PM. |
|
03-25-2009, 03:59 AM | #48 (permalink) |
Fish in the percolator!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hobbit Land NZ
Posts: 2,870
|
The guy admits that it indicates correlation over causation so the title is really just an attention seeking hook.
And I know plenty of very intelligent people with rather deplorable musical tastes.
__________________
|
03-25-2009, 04:27 AM | #50 (permalink) |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
From the FAQ on that site : "Most of the musical artists are popular across wide SAT ranges"
Since the data is not consistent, that makes it a lot harder to say listening to that band makes it more likely that you are dumb or smart. I expect if the sample size was bigger and the selection of participants more representative, then the differences here between bands would smoothen out more. And of course music doesn't make you dumb .. It's just a hook. edit : Just for fun and to prove a little point, I used my own die-roller script to generate 10 numbers between 1 and 400 which is roughly the range of the SAT scores. Then I divided each value by 10 to get the averages. These are the numbers I got : 160,6 174,0 194,7 220,9 210,4 241,7 181,0 162,7 209,3 221,9 Most of them are relatively uniformly distributed around the mean, but I've bolded the highest and lowest scores. What you can see here is that even though we know the real average here is ~200, we have one value at 160 and one at 240. (To check if the average is ~200, I can pick 1000 numbers between 1 and 400 and see if that approximates 200000 .. then I get 196325. 196325/1000 = 196,325 ~ 200) If you say that 240 is U2 and MC Hammer is 160, then you can draw the conclusion that people listening to MC Hammer are more stupid than people listening to U2. However, in this example, it doesn't matter what they listen to since they are all random numbers. The difference is explained by stochastics, random chance. I don't know what kind of numbers of observations he has behind each group here, but I assume they are very small numbers and that makes it almost certain that random chance will mess with his results. F.ex, how many people are behind Beethoven's ratings on the chart? Abuse of statistics, I think.
__________________
Something Completely Different Last edited by Guybrush; 03-25-2009 at 05:54 AM. |
|