Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   The Lounge (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/)
-   -   which came first... (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/3831-came-first.html)

spearmint 12-15-2004 11:36 AM

It wasn't a stupid post, I just haven't had a lot of time to come on here recently and the thread was made in a fly in visit...I'm basically writting a paper on it (don't ask) and I have to say which one and why...even explaining evolution etc...part of it is to include other peoples veiws on it
sorry I didn't make this clear to start, I didn't have a lot of time

rise_above 12-18-2004 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oi_To_The_World
i think it started off as a stupid useless post, and then people got philosophical with it. but yes, KFC is delicious. what ever happened to colonel sanders? i bet he knows which came first, after all he did live to like 120 years old

how long did he do commercials for KFC?

Moniker 12-18-2004 05:41 AM

The chicken came first, any way you look at it.

Creationism: God made a chicken first, and the chicken had eggs later.

Evolution (this one's more complicated but follow closely): You've got chickens, and before them came pre-chickens. Let's call them cluckens. So you've got cluckens laying clucken-eggs on and on through evolution. Eventually the clucken is going to evolve into what is now a chicken. But the clucken lays clucken-eggs, not chicken eggs. So the first chicken isn't born in a chicken-egg, since that egg was laid by a clucken. The first chicken-egg only comes about after the first chicken was already born, so the chicken came first this way too. Unless you use the loophole that the question doesn't specify chicken eggs, but you'd have to have really low self-esteem and inadequacy issues to say something like that.

Thrice 12-18-2004 08:55 AM

Actually adam got hungry before eve and sin and all that, so god made him a chicken. The chicken laid an egg, then adam ate the chicken. Thats the true story. Its in the bible

Raine 12-18-2004 03:40 PM

First I'd like to say that I'm not big on KFC.
Here in PA the local KFC's are synonymous with poison.

And I'm pretty sure the chicken came before the egg. After a year of bio and some other classes related to science and whatever I'm pretty sure the chicken came first.

And there is actual proof that dinosaurs or whatever was left of them went through a couple of evolutionary processes and their closest current living relative that is still alive today is the bird.
And since I'm pretty sure dinosaurs were around longer than the birds it is safe to assume that a dinosaur evolved into a chicken. And that chicken met another chicken (that used to be a dinosaur) they hit it off since to each other they were the last of their species on the planet and they decided to just skip the date and move straight on to the sex and together they made a egg that would later hatch and prove the love they each had for each other. Or the hormones anyway.

And that's the end of that.

Oi_To_The_World 12-18-2004 04:12 PM

i think this whole chicken vs. egg thing is a KFC coverup, and the colonel knows the true answer, but he's dead, so now we're f*cked.

rise_above 12-18-2004 04:25 PM

time to call in the tv telepaths

covle 12-19-2004 04:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moniker
The chicken came first, any way you look at it.

Creationism: God made a chicken first, and the chicken had eggs later.

Evolution (this one's more complicated but follow closely): You've got chickens, and before them came pre-chickens. Let's call them cluckens. So you've got cluckens laying clucken-eggs on and on through evolution. Eventually the clucken is going to evolve into what is now a chicken. But the clucken lays clucken-eggs, not chicken eggs. So the first chicken isn't born in a chicken-egg, since that egg was laid by a clucken. The first chicken-egg only comes about after the first chicken was already born, so the chicken came first this way too. Unless you use the loophole that the question doesn't specify chicken eggs, but you'd have to have really low self-esteem and inadequacy issues to say something like that.

but the argument here could also be that it was a chicken in this egg, it wasnt a clucken egg at all then was it? it was a chicken egg, as a chicken was within. sure a clucken laid this egg, but its a chicken egg in my opinion.

covle 12-19-2004 04:39 AM

"what came first the chicken or the moron?
id say the moron potty trained or not"

AmyLeeFan 12-28-2004 09:59 PM

Chicken.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:31 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.