|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-21-2008, 11:14 PM | #42 (permalink) |
Occams Razor
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: End of the Earth
Posts: 2,472
|
I Hate Dolphins
__________________
Me, Myself and I United as One If you're posting in the music forums make sure to be thoughtful and expressive, if you're posting in the lounge ask yourself "is this something that adds to the conversation?" It's important to remember that a lot of people use each thread. You're probably not as funny or clever as you think, I know I'm not. My Van Morrison Discography Thread |
12-30-2008, 08:10 PM | #44 (permalink) |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
Dolphins being the "only other species to have sex for pleasure" makes no sense on several different levels (f.ex 1 - more than 2 species do this and 2 - there are several species of "dolphins") and the millipede looks like a centipede ..
Just saying!
__________________
Something Completely Different |
12-30-2008, 08:46 PM | #45 (permalink) |
Fish in the percolator!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hobbit Land NZ
Posts: 2,870
|
Hey tore
I'm helping my brother choose his major and papers for uni this year and we've decided on a BSc specialising in ecology (specifically marine ecology) which consists of many ecology related and general biology papers, 2 environmental science papers, 2 marine science papers, a statistics paper, a biometry paper, a geography paper and maybe some geology papers. So instead of doing a BSc majoring in biology and simply choosing marine/ecology related papers, he's opting for the ecology specialisation. The downside of this is that with all the extra non-bio papers, he won't have room to fit in any of the microbio/chem/biochem/cellular bio papers that are on offer in first year. I never did biology at school (I was a chem/physics/calc/languages guy) so I can offer him little insight. I'm just wondering if there's much demand for ecologists and whether he'd be severely limiting himself by sticking to whole organism biology? edit: maybe this should have been a PM
__________________
|
12-30-2008, 09:43 PM | #46 (permalink) | ||
Certified H00d Classic
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bernie Sanders's yacht
Posts: 6,129
|
Nah, you helped bump my thread, which is always a good thing.
__________________
Anteater's 21 Fav Albums Of 2020 Anteater's Daily Tune Roulette Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-31-2008, 06:09 AM | #48 (permalink) | |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
Quote:
I think statistics is very important and while you can learn it on your own, getting it in your education will be very helpful. Learning about the environment in general, wether it is wind currents, water currents, sedimentation around river estuaries or the physics on how fur or fat can insulate against the cold is important, but of course biologists get away with knowing less about this than meteorologists, physicists, geologists and oceanographers do. As a result, it should be possible to learn what you need from these fields in the future in your spare time. I was fortunate to get a bit of everything, but if I had to choose, I would probably get more into molecular biology and physiology. There are many hard (and boring) topics there and so it may be a good idea to learn those in a "school setting". Biology starts at the molecular level, so it's a good basis. It does open more doors and genetics are getting very important. For example, ecologists compare genetics between different creatures all the time. So, those are my two kroners.
__________________
Something Completely Different |
|
|