A question to vegetarians - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-07-2011, 02:42 AM   #631 (permalink)
Rocket Appliances
 
DoctorSoft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,335
Default

id chow down on the mother****er, i love eating people
DoctorSoft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 02:47 AM   #632 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loose_lips_sink_ships View Post
In some parts of Africa there are some tribes that eat their dead kin in order to honor them. It makes sense to me and it's something that I might have to do if I was a missionary in those parts. They only eat relatives and members of the community who have died of natural causes and they get rid of all their worldly possessions in their way of dealing with the death of a loved one. Some people may find that sickening, but I actually find it as a beautiful concept. The thought of having that person inside you forever is mind boggling.

So guys, if you were living with one of those tribes for a while would you take part of those rituals, or would you rather fall out of an airplane without a parachute? I think I might be able to get away with a little nibble, only to honor the tribe and be respectful.
cannibalism gives rise to a host of diseases

but yeah, i think i'll have a bite also just for the taste
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 04:26 AM   #633 (permalink)
A.B.N.
 
djchameleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loose_lips_sink_ships View Post
Some people may find that sickening, but I actually find it as a beautiful concept. The thought of having that person inside you forever is mind boggling.

So guys, if you were living with one of those tribes for a while would you take part of those rituals, or would you rather fall out of an airplane without a parachute? I think I might be able to get away with a little nibble, only to honor the tribe and be respectful.
the person wouldn't be inside you forever because you would digest them and crap them out.

I would only eat the heart and liver those are the most nutritious anything else no thanks.
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RoxyRollah View Post
IMO I don't know jack-**** though so don't listen to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle View Post
The problem is that most police officers in America are psychopaths.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
You're a terrible dictionary.
djchameleon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 04:58 AM   #634 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djchameleon View Post
the person wouldn't be inside you forever because you would digest them and crap them out.

I would only eat the heart and liver those are the most nutritious anything else no thanks.
Nah, it's more of a spiritual thing, they believe that once you take in a piece of someone, they will remain with you till you die. I do know how how the digestive system works, I have taken several health classes.
Farfisa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 05:02 AM   #635 (permalink)
A.B.N.
 
djchameleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loose_lips_sink_ships View Post
Nah, it's more of a spiritual thing, they believe that once you take in a piece of someone, they will remain with you till you die. I do know how how the digestive system works, I have taken several health classes.
I don't get the whole spiritual thing because if they are eating the body for spiritual reasons, they aren't eating the spirit, they are eating the body which are two separate entities. I don't get it.
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RoxyRollah View Post
IMO I don't know jack-**** though so don't listen to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle View Post
The problem is that most police officers in America are psychopaths.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
You're a terrible dictionary.
djchameleon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 10:50 AM   #636 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Il Duce View Post
it is some sort of moral criteria - if they haven't reached a state of "sapiency", where I feel I'm in the wrong for killing them or at least encouraging them to be killed, I figger it's alright then...
But my question is, why is "sapiency" the deciding factor in whether or not an animal can be eaten? What is it about "sapiency" that should be preserved? Pigs are well known to be relatively intelligent. They have feelings and emotions. They can feel pain and suffer. They care for their young. I'm sure I could go on about how pigs are more than just unthinking machines that eat, sleep, and poop. Yet, we eat them almost without thinking.

So, for us to be okay with killing and eating them, all these things (many of which humans also show) must not be a deciding factor in whether or not we should eat them. I mean if killing and eating something that feels emotions isn't truly wrong, why should we have arrested Jeffrey Dahmer? What particular aspect of "sapiency" is wrong to destroy, when it is okay to disregard emotions, the ability to suffer, life in general, etc when deciding whether or not to eat something?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 10:52 AM   #637 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djchameleon View Post
the person wouldn't be inside you forever because you would digest them and crap them out.

I would only eat the heart and liver those are the most nutritious anything else no thanks.
That's sick! Liver?!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 10:59 AM   #638 (permalink)
AWhatup Ganache?
 
Mykonos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 381
Default

Elephants are so intelligent that they ritualise their dead. And yet some humans are okay killing them just to rip out their tusks for ivory.
__________________
'Not that Becktionary, the Rhyming Becktionary!'- Bender Bending Rodriguez
Mykonos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 11:03 AM   #639 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Paedantic Basterd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mykonos View Post
Elephants are so intelligent that they ritualise their dead. And yet some humans are okay killing them just to rip out their tusks for ivory.
Crows have been observed gathering in the locations of deceased crows, much in the manner of funerals.
Paedantic Basterd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 11:09 AM   #640 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
But my question is, why is "sapiency" the deciding factor in whether or not an animal can be eaten? What is it about "sapiency" that should be preserved? Pigs are well known to be relatively intelligent. They have feelings and emotions. They can feel pain and suffer. They care for their young. I'm sure I could go on about how pigs are more than just unthinking machines that eat, sleep, and poop. Yet, we eat them almost without thinking.

So, for us to be okay with killing and eating them, all these things (many of which humans also show) must not be a deciding factor in whether or not we should eat them. I mean if killing and eating something that feels emotions isn't truly wrong, why should we have arrested Jeffrey Dahmer? What particular aspect of "sapiency" is wrong to destroy, when it is okay to disregard emotions, the ability to suffer, life in general, etc when deciding whether or not to eat something?
but are pigs really intelligent in the human sense?

or are we just anthropomorphising them based on observation?
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.