A question to vegetarians - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-30-2011, 08:59 PM   #601 (permalink)
I sleep in your hat
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Melbourne, Vic. Aus.
Posts: 1,847
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VEGANGELICA View Post
If you met someone who eats dogs and cats, would you feel judgemental or would you just shrug and say, "Meh, to each her own?"

And if you *are* judgemental of people who eat dogs and cats, then why wouldn't you expect vegetarians to be judgemental of meat-eaters who eat other animal species, such as cows, pigs, and chickens?

If someone eats an animal who has died of natural causes, I wouldn't feel judgemental because the person didn't orchestrate that animal's death. However, when someone supports the killing of animals, especially when there are healthful ways to live without doing so, then I'm more likely to feel judgemental (even of myself).

Being free from critique and judgement certainly feels nice, and judgementalism *can* lead to horrible situations (when those who are judgemental decide to physically hurt people with whom they disagree), but judgementalism has also helped reduce or end numerous atrocities (slavery, child labor, capital punishment, etc.), and so I don't consider judgementalism to be a foe. Passing judgement on an action can be an inspiration for change.

And frankly, in my opinion eating animals is a lot worse than being judgemental.
An intelligent, articulate argument. How refreshing.
Stephen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 08:30 PM   #602 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VEGANGELICA View Post
If you met someone who eats dogs and cats, would you feel judgemental or would you just shrug and say, "Meh, to each her own?"

And if you *are* judgemental of people who eat dogs and cats, then why wouldn't you expect vegetarians to be judgemental of meat-eaters who eat other animal species, such as cows, pigs, and chickens?

If someone eats an animal who has died of natural causes, I wouldn't feel judgemental because the person didn't orchestrate that animal's death. However, when someone supports the killing of animals, especially when there are healthful ways to live without doing so, then I'm more likely to feel judgemental (even of myself).

Being free from critique and judgement certainly feels nice, and judgementalism *can* lead to horrible situations (when those who are judgemental decide to physically hurt people with whom they disagree), but judgementalism has also helped reduce or end numerous atrocities (slavery, child labor, capital punishment, etc.), and so I don't consider judgementalism to be a foe. Passing judgement on an action can be an inspiration for change.

And frankly, in my opinion eating animals is a lot worse than being judgemental.
in my opinion, you only base it on awareness and feelings, which to me, are on a lower level of evolutional development of the brain

as long as any animal does not have the ability to view itself objectively, rather than going through the mechanics of life, and possess a "consciousness" as we do, i think it's fine to eat them
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 08:32 PM   #603 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Paedantic Basterd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,184
Default

How are feelings a lower evolutionary development when... we're the only ones who have developed them to this extent?
Paedantic Basterd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 08:34 PM   #604 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
How are feelings a lower evolutionary development when... we're the only ones who have developed them to this extent?
animals might still evolve

when they get somewhat a consciousness and an objective sense, i'd campaign for no killing of animals

that's the theory anyway
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 08:36 PM   #605 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Paedantic Basterd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,184
Default

Yeah, that didn't answer my question at all. We're the only species to have developed such a complex system of emotions. If we're the paradigm, then how is this development a "lesser" aspect of life?
Paedantic Basterd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 08:38 PM   #606 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
Yeah, that didn't answer my question at all. We're the only species to have developed such a complex system of emotions. If we're the paradigm, then how is this development a "lesser" aspect of life?
oh I was referring to VEGANGELICA's usage of "feelings" in animal sense, as in "sensations of pain"

i'm not talking about "emotions"

i meant "sensations of pain" are a lower level of evolutionary develoment
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 08:42 PM   #607 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Paedantic Basterd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,184
Default

I was under the impression you meant it was based on her feelings, hence the misunderstanding.

Pain isn't a lesser development. It's actually very important to the preservation of our bodies. Research CIPA. Not having any sensation of pain brings about a host of real life complications and actually puts you at severe risk. Pain is the sensation that tells our minds "stop doing that, it's bad".
Paedantic Basterd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 08:48 PM   #608 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
I was under the impression you meant it was based on her feelings, hence the misunderstanding.

Pain isn't a lesser development. It's actually very important to the preservation of our bodies. Research CIPA. Not having any sensation of pain brings about a host of real life complications and actually puts you at severe risk. Pain is the sensation that tells our minds "stop doing that, it's bad".
it's still a basic survival defense

only because we are so clever, we use it to detect medical ailments
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 08:51 PM   #609 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Paedantic Basterd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Il Duce View Post
it's still a basic survival defense

only because we are so clever, we use it to detect medical ailments
Patients with CIPA are at severe risk of anything from infection to brain damage. Not feeling the pain does not mean you have not been injured. You may have a wound, broken bone, or concussion that needs immediate medical attention, and not know it. CIPA patients regularly have to check their bodies for injury, from scrapes to burns to biting their tongues off in their sleep. I am getting the impression that you think we should develop immortality, rather than insensitivity to pain.
Paedantic Basterd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2011, 02:00 AM   #610 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
Patients with CIPA are at severe risk of anything from infection to brain damage. Not feeling the pain does not mean you have not been injured. You may have a wound, broken bone, or concussion that needs immediate medical attention, and not know it. CIPA patients regularly have to check their bodies for injury, from scrapes to burns to biting their tongues off in their sleep. I am getting the impression that you think we should develop immortality, rather than insensitivity to pain.
i meant the basic element of pain is not a highly evolved trait

of course CIPA patients are having a medical ailment, in that they can't feel pain, it doesn't mean they're less evolved or more evolved

i mean the sensation itself is available to the most basic of animals

i think you're misunderstanding me

other interesting, maybe pertinent points, raised by some other posters on a more or less similar discussion:-

one said cows are basically pretty stupid animals, if you look into their eyes, it's like staring into a black hole, cows are just a mass source of meat for predators, and Native Americans used to drive droves of buffaloes and cattle off cliffs like lemmings

another said not only is eating meat questionable, the idea of domesticating animals as pets is questionable - it's creepy to get a pet and then train them to "human" habits, when obviously this is against the animalistic traits, like chewing on the rug, crapping on floors - then when you adopt a puppy and it can't be housetrained, you return it to the pet store
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.