Conservapedia (country, income, quote, Lute) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-21-2008, 09:44 PM   #31 (permalink)
Pale and Wan
 
Fruitonica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aus
Posts: 917
Default

Quote:
Altruism specifically calls for putting another's interests above your own. If this is the case, then you put another's life before your own. If you put another life before your own, you do not care about your own survival because your own life is not your highest value.

Giving to others isn't necessarily altruism. You can give to others in your own rational self interest. It is just that you must never give more than you will receive. Otherwise you are irrational.
Do you think only in extremes? The gaping flaw in your argument is the ridiculous extrapolation that you cannot value your life if it isn't your highest priority.

Also, giving to others without expecting a return is only irrational if you adopt a selfish approach to life where personal gain is your greatest ambition.
Fruitonica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 04:58 PM   #32 (permalink)
sleepe
 
Double X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: boston
Posts: 1,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
Rational self-interest.
Sweden is basically socialist and they are doing quite well.
Double X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 06:03 PM   #33 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Methville
Posts: 2,116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
but this philosophy is the most logical philosophy out there.
No it isn't. Ayn Rand was crazy. Truly one of the worst philosophers of all time.
The Unfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 06:19 PM   #34 (permalink)
Existential Egoist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Unfan View Post
No it isn't. Ayn Rand was crazy. Truly one of the worst philosophers of all time.
How? You are going to actually have to point out some flaws in it so that you make any sense.

Quote:
Do you think only in extremes? The gaping flaw in your argument is the ridiculous extrapolation that you cannot value your life if it isn't your highest priority.
Altruism according to wikipedia is:

"Altruism is selfless concern for the welfare of others."

Selfless, meaning one does not value his interests above others.

Quote:
Sweden is basically socialist and they are doing quite well.
Socialism is slavery. If one cannot own what he works for then it is slavery. I don't care where it is going. Forcing one to give up property rights for your illogical beliefs is contradictory to the idea that another's interests should go before theirs.
Inuzuka Skysword is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 06:25 PM   #35 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
The Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 803
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
Socialism is slavery. If one cannot own what he works for then it is slavery. I don't care where it is going. Forcing one to give up property rights for your illogical beliefs is contradictory to the idea that another's interests should go before theirs.
What about those who cannot work? What about those whose jobs and money have been lost due to an economic crisis? What about the old, whose pension can no longer cover the necessities of life? What about the children born into poor families with little hope for higher education? Equal opportunity doesn't exist in today's society.
__________________
Now another stranger seems to want you to ignore his dreams as though they were the burden of some other

The Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 06:33 PM   #36 (permalink)
Existential Egoist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Monkey View Post
What about those who cannot work? What about those whose jobs and money have been lost due to an economic crisis? What about the old, whose pension can no longer cover the necessities of life? What about the children born into poor families with little hope for higher education? Equal opportunity doesn't exist in today's society.
All rights come from man's right to his own life. Nothing be a right if it violates someone else's right to life. Property rights are rights based on the right to life because a man must own property in order to sustain himself.

Society shouldn't have to care about those people. Charity can still be given to people because it is voluntary. Secondly, there has never been a truly free market in the world. In a truly free market, rational people will make it to the top. Kids inheriting companies from their dad's will probably not happen unless the kid knows the business well.

Last edited by Inuzuka Skysword; 10-22-2008 at 08:27 PM.
Inuzuka Skysword is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 08:44 PM   #37 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Methville
Posts: 2,116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
How? You are going to actually have to point out some flaws in it so that you make any sense.
If reason is the only absolutely you can not reason out other absolutes. For instance, time is not absolute for time is not reason. However if you could reasonably determine that time necessarily exists than you must discard your previous stance.
The Unfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 10:07 PM   #38 (permalink)
Pale and Wan
 
Fruitonica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aus
Posts: 917
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
Altruism according to wikipedia is:

"Altruism is selfless concern for the welfare of others."

Selfless, meaning one does not value his interests above others.
That addresses nothing about my post. From here explain how valuing someone's interest above your own means you cannot place any value on your own life.
Fruitonica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2008, 12:29 PM   #39 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Applenux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
Socialism is slavery. If one cannot own what he works for then it is slavery.
If one have to pay for hospital and can be killed legally, even if he's under 18, how do you call that ? A lot of people in the world would call that dictatorship. I call that USA.

And socialism DOESN'T mean you can't own what you work for. It means that even if you can't buy, food, health..., you can have it.

(USSR was a dictatorship, that's true, but every socialists nations aren't)
__________________
Ceci n'est pas une signature. Ou pas. Au fait je m'en balance les couilles : personne va comprendre !
Applenux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2008, 05:03 PM   #40 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,565
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Unfan View Post
No it isn't. Ayn Rand was crazy. Truly one of the worst philosophers of all time.
yeah, developing a healty self-esteem and living life to the fullest sound like horrible ideas to me too.
anticipation is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.