|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#18 (permalink) |
;)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 3,511
|
![]()
/redundancy
that's not really a paradox anyway, here's a fun paradox: consider a set of all sets which do not contain themselves as a member. would this set contain itself? or the next statement is true: the previous statement is false |
![]() |
![]() |