|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Who is most unlikely to be president in U.S.A. in 2008? | |||
Pacifist |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Homosexual |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 42.86% |
Non-wasp |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Atheist |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 19.05% |
Person of faith that's Non Christian |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 28.57% |
Woman |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 9.52% |
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Aural melody discerner
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: in a truck down by the interstate
Posts: 347
|
![]()
We are supposed to be the most advanced society in the world today (U.S.A.) Then, why is it that many of us have such narrow views of personality traits which don't make you any less of a person?
Pretend for a moment that it is 2006, and we're unaware of who's running for president. (Or pretend it's 2008, and just don't say, 'well so and so's less likely to win, because they didn't get one of the major party nominations') Who would be most unlikely to be voted President of the U.S.A.? |
![]() |
|