Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   The Lounge (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/)
-   -   Did America really put a man on the moon? (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/29491-did-america-really-put-man-moon.html)

bruise_violet 04-08-2008 05:11 PM

yes i am ;)

hidden it in order to expose how fake it was when they finally are the first to land on the moon.

right-track 04-08-2008 05:22 PM


Chronotub 04-08-2008 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bruise_violet (Post 465938)
yes i am ;)

hidden it in order to expose how fake it was when they finally are the first to land on the moon.

only they gave up attempting to land on the moon, which takes us back to were we started

they had nothing to gain and everything to lose buy keeping it covered up, so why did they?

bruise_violet 04-08-2008 05:27 PM

Maybe they knew who the spies were?

I don't really know or care because I doubt I'll ever believe it until I get there myself.

Chronotub 04-08-2008 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bruise_violet (Post 465955)
Maybe they knew who the spies were?

I don't really know or care because I doubt I'll ever believe it until I get there myself.

then why not arest them? and they were monitoring the movement of the craft and it's comunication with nasa, as were many civilians across the world

bruise_violet 04-09-2008 10:27 AM

I dont even know if what you are saying is true, but HONESTLY, men on the moon over 3 decades ago and none since. Why?

No matter what you say I just wont believe it.

Chronotub 04-11-2008 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bruise_violet (Post 466291)
I dont even know if what you are saying is true, but HONESTLY, men on the moon over 3 decades ago and none since. Why?

because we have no reason to send anyone to the moon? it costs money which can be better spent else where

Quote:

Originally Posted by bruise_violet (Post 466291)
No matter what you say I just wont believe it.

so you've made up your mind and refuse to listen to anything else

polka_tulk 04-12-2008 11:50 PM

i think it would have been harder to fake it and keep it quiet than actually going to the moon. plus they left things on the moon which are actually visible from the earth with a telescope.

datafox 04-13-2008 11:22 AM

They totally faked it. Search the subject on Google Video and watch the FOX special. The only thing that's frustrating is that there's no concrete proof as NASA keeps denying it. And of course they would. There's something fundamentally wrong on all sorts of levels with North American governments. Hell. All governments.

bruise_violet 04-13-2008 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chronotub (Post 467338)
because we have no reason to send anyone to the moon? it costs money which can be better spent else where


so you've made up your mind and refuse to listen to anything else

well yeah i'm a stubborn sonovabitch

it's just beyond my sense of reasoning.

like explain to me that fairies are real.

Chronotub 04-13-2008 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bruise_violet (Post 468736)

like explain to me that fairies are real.

exept there's no evidence fairies are real and plenty of evidence that we went to the moon

bruise_violet 04-13-2008 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chronotub (Post 469035)
exept there's no evidence fairies are real and plenty of evidence that we went to the moon

Except I don't believe that evidence and there are plenty of 6 year old girls who will tell you otherwise.

datafox 04-13-2008 04:34 PM

The photos have been doctored. There's evidence right on them. Look at the cross hairs. WHERE ARE THE STARS? Why is there no blast underneath the lunar lander? Explain this to me.

Chronotub 04-13-2008 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bruise_violet (Post 469041)
Except I don't believe that evidence and there are plenty of 6 year old girls who will tell you otherwise.

but what are your reasons for disregarding that evidence?

datafox 04-13-2008 04:37 PM

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT WE WENT TO THE MOON. The "evidence" we do have is obviously fake. That's what he's trying to tell you.

Chronotub 04-13-2008 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by datafox (Post 469097)
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT WE WENT TO THE MOON. The "evidence" we do have is obviously fake. That's what he's trying to tell you.

there is plenty of evidence that would be very hard if not impossible to fake, ALL evidence that we did not go to the moon is based on poor science and missinformation

datafox 04-13-2008 04:42 PM

lol. watch this:

Google Video


And then tell me that.

bruise_violet 04-13-2008 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chronotub (Post 469090)
but what are your reasons for disregarding that evidence?

I have told you already I think, it is just completely above all realms of sanity.

datafox 04-13-2008 04:51 PM

"Make it, or fake it." Russia scared the hell out of them when they successfully sent sputnik up into orbit.

They even refuse to send their astronauts to the moon due to the radiation they might possibly encounter, and how the Americans have seemed to come home without ANY symptoms baffles them. As their suits were crap at the time and couldn't possibly protect them from it during one of the worst solar storms caused by the sun recorded at that time which lasted 3 days.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bruise_violet (Post 469137)
I have told you already I think, it is just completely above all realms of sanity.

Hun, you need to learn to back up your opinions rather than force them. :)

Chronotub 04-13-2008 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by datafox (Post 469089)
The photos have been doctored. There's evidence right on them.

no they havent and no there isn't

Quote:

Originally Posted by datafox (Post 469089)
Look at the cross hairs.

what about em? some are out of position, but then as some photo's were cropped this is to be expected

some of them apear to be behind objects, but this has only been noted on white objects, it's not uncommen for a bright colour to bleed into a darker colour in photos

Quote:

Originally Posted by datafox (Post 469089)
WHERE ARE THE STARS?

IN THE SKY, you just can't see them due to the light from the sun, just as you can't see stars during the day, or if you stand under a lamp post

Quote:

Originally Posted by datafox (Post 469089)
Why is there no blast underneath the lunar lander? Explain this to me.

because when it landed very little thrust was being given out by the luner lander

datafox 04-13-2008 04:55 PM

HHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I feel sorry for you.

simplephysics 04-13-2008 04:57 PM

I'm 100% with Chronotub on this one.

If it was fake I'm sure we would have more "trips" to the moon recorded by now.

Chronotub 04-13-2008 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by datafox (Post 469148)
HHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I feel sorry for you.

I feel sorry for you, srsy learn some phisics

sweet_nothing 04-13-2008 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ComingUpRoses (Post 469150)
I'm 100% with Chronotub on this one.

If it was fake I'm sure we would have more "trips" to the moon recorded by now.

I know how far has tech come in the last decades that we can't send a shuttle up without some little thing breaking off? Yet these guys did it?

datafox 04-13-2008 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chronotub (Post 469153)
I feel sorry for you, srsy learn some phisics

Learn how to use spellcheck. Don't try to intimidate me with acedemics.

simplephysics 04-13-2008 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sweet_nothing (Post 469156)
I know how far has tech come in the last decades that we can't send a shuttle up without some little thing breaking off? Yet these guys did it?

You misread what I said.
I believe whole-heartedly that a man has been to the moon.
Just because there have been mistakes made recently doesn't mean they couldn't have done it back in the 60's.

Chronotub 04-13-2008 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by datafox (Post 469159)
Learn how to use spellcheck. Don't try to intimidate me with acedemics.

I'm dispraxic, but don't see what my spelling has to do with anything

datafox 04-13-2008 05:06 PM

Oh. yes. it does. They killed the man who knew it. They put him and his family out of their misery along with his report that proved it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chronotub (Post 469163)
I'm dispraxic, but don't see what my spelling has to do with anything

Either way, don't try to intimidate me with acedemics. You have no idea who I am, what I've been educated on, or what I do in life.

sweet_nothing 04-13-2008 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by datafox (Post 469167)
Either way, don't try to intimidate me with acedemics. You have no idea who I am, what I've been educated on, or what I do in life.

Yeah, she told me what she does and I was intimidated, she knows what she's talking about

Chronotub 04-13-2008 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by datafox (Post 469167)
Either way, don't try to intimidate me with acedemics. You have no idea who I am, what I've been educated on, or what I do in life.

true, but I can make judgements from your post

and I'm not trying to intimidate you

datafox 04-13-2008 05:15 PM

lmfao shut up you smart ass. It's the principal of the matter. It is rude and uncalled for to throw something like "learn more physics" in someones face. For all you know, I've majored in physics. You might have as well. It's simply rude to assume that I'm of a simpler mind simply because we have disagreeing opinions.

Chronotub 04-13-2008 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by datafox (Post 469193)
lmfao shut up you smart ass. It's the principal of the matter. It is rude and uncalled for to throw something like "learn more physics" in someones face. For all you know, I've majored in physics. You might have as well. It's simply rude to assume that I'm of a simpler mind simply because we have disagreeing opinions.

and this wasn't rude and uncalled for?

Quote:

Originally Posted by datafox (Post 469148)
HHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I feel sorry for you.


datafox 04-13-2008 05:18 PM

Okay, point taken. Let's both rub our noses in our ****.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:27 AM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.