Questions for conservatives (American, African, quote, 1984) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-23-2008, 01:05 AM   #51 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
[MERIT]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 4,814
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProggyMan View Post
Uh, slavery doesn't mean not having rights.
How so? If you are enslaved, your master can dictate your every move. You are his property, and have no rights as an individual.
[MERIT] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 01:07 AM   #52 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Methville
Posts: 2,116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oojay View Post
How so? If you are enslaved, your master can dictate your every move. You are his property, and have no rights as an individual.
But if the person consents to those conditions than it is a non-issue.
The Unfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 01:10 AM   #53 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
[MERIT]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 4,814
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Unfan View Post
But if the person consents to those conditions than it is a non-issue.
Well, when the choice is to "consent" or get lynched by a group of hooded klansmen, it's not really a fair choice.
[MERIT] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 01:14 AM   #54 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Methville
Posts: 2,116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oojay View Post
Well, when the choice is to "consent" or get lynched by a group of hooded klansmen, it's not really a fair choice.
You're right, sort of. If the person in question consents to being put in the position to make that choice than the choice is fair. However, that is a weird case that will probably never come up.
The Unfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 04:03 AM   #55 (permalink)
Aural melody discerner
 
Miltamec Soundsquinaez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: in a truck down by the interstate
Posts: 347
Default

I agree that we should do away with the FCC. I don't think we should censor ourselves, even around little kids. We should still be gentle with kids, but we shouldn't refrain from swearing around them, or protect them from violence on T.V. and in the movies. Kids are smarter than that, and trying to protect them from things only leads to more curiosity on their part. The only reason we try to be so sweety-weety with our kids in this society is so the parents can vicariously live through them with that stage of life when they were sweet and innocent, and things weren't so uncertain. Then, once they're teens, we basically look at them like they're garbage.
As far as the anti-discrimination laws, that's a tough one. You make a good point, Unfan. The government trying to force us what to think is like something out of Orwell's 1984, and is not good. However, when that law is not enforced, and an african-american is denied work over and over and over again, I can imagine them feeling a bit outraged, and I can't very easily say, 'well, that's life,' deal with it,' because racism is stupid. Maybe the government should censor how we treat people, if people are too g*ddamn ignorant to realize that racism and prejudice is only hatred of an individual's self and inability to grow, radiated outward. Racism still exists today, and it pains me to see that people are unable to look deeper, and look inside themselves for the seeds of their hate.
Miltamec Soundsquinaez is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.