crukster |
03-23-2011 08:50 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by s_k
(Post 1023544)
Hmmm, I'm afraid even s_k man has to agree with Phanastasio.
I mean she does have a point. I'm not happy with extremism of any sort in my neighbourhood, but on the long term it does indeed cause progress.
I wonder if progress is useful, though. I mean, what would happen if progress would just stop right now. Would that be a bad thing? Would it make the future any worse?
|
Yeah of course if progress stops, the World stops. Or at least circles the drain till it stops.
But I can't agree that extremism is good. Anything that could be done with an extremist approach could be done better with a light handed approach. I think of extremism as the "all guns blazing" approach - run in, shoot the place up, fix whats left.
Well instead of that you could use your brain and just shoot what you need to shoot.
Like extremist Muslims - Al Queda etc. If it's not all one big conspiracy and they really were fighting for freedom of the middle east, then there are better ways to do that than to blow up a civilian building on enemy soil with suicide pilots. What they did was an extreme act, in the long run it just screws things up more.
Extremism might give you some immediate form of progression, but it always comes with the price of picking up the pieces and counting up the casualties.
It's like punching a door in so hard that you break your hand just to get in. You could find a better way.
|