I doubt that, and in that case the same deceptive argument applies.
https://i.imgur.com/OkwRA9g.png

You doubt that? Really?

yeah I'm not sure, like I said basically Hitler is our Satan, that's about as impactful as it gets. Name one

I mean technically you could make a case for people like the Greek who invented democracy (was that Pericles?) but those people don't live as a similar figure/symbol in our collective imagnation nowadays. I mean the fact that I'm not sure who I'm talking about says enough (even though it's partly due to it being 1 am here I guess)

Just admit that the truth is you guys didn't say Hitler cause you kinda like him.

Hitler fought street battles armed with a bull whip. Automatically better than Mitch McConnell.

In the history of all the stretches I've seen here to accuse each other of fascism, this is the stretchiest stretch. You're like Godwin's Cat

lincoln? Napoleon? Stalin? Mao?

Nah maybe Mao because of the sheer number of Chinese people whose lives are directly shaped by him but apart from that nope

Uh so maybe not quite as impactful as Hitler in your opinion but still in the same league in terms of being massive historical figures... None of whom you guys picked which tells me you just weren't thinking historically which would have been a better rebuttal instead of trying to make a special "hitler doesn't count" rule lol

If the argument is that Hitler is too mainstream you guys still lose for not picking a smaller but still evil dictator like mussolini or mugabe etc

Either way the moral of the story is I win. :beer:

Napoleon was like the Hitler of times past before Hitler made Napoleon obsolete. And Napoleon is way cooler than Hitler.