The nobody knows what the **** I'm bangin' on about thread (country, quote)

~~Gates_of_Iscariot~~ · 12-28-2007, 06:56 PM

my opinion
Isreal did it
with musharaff because Bhutto was going to expose him and bush's connections with Israel and how Omar supposedly killed osama

jibber · 12-28-2007, 09:18 PM

^ do you have any information whatsoever to back up that claim? or is it another theory along the same lines as bush planned 9/11 and santa claus and the easter bunny are evil mascots thought up by the government designed and keep the world hooked on fatty foods laced with mind control hormones?

~~Gates_of_Iscariot~~ · 12-28-2007, 10:14 PM

al qaeda are not terrorists just an oppressive government ( denotes USS COLE >.>)

sleepy jack · 12-28-2007, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gates_of_Iscariot

al qaeda are not terrorists just an oppressive government ( denotes USS COLE >.>)

Lol what? Yes they are. Even if that were true I don't understand your logic, Al-Qaeda can't have committed it because they're a government but Israel could've because they're a what? Answer this for me, I know you can.

jibber · 12-28-2007, 10:26 PM

I'm not sure where to begin with the stupidity of that statement. Maybe with the "government" label. To be a government, they would actually have to have power over a country. Al-queda hasn't had control over afghanistan for a long time now. Actually, I'm not even going to bother continuing this explanation, that statement was just too retarded to waste any more time on.

I'll get on to the issue of the thread and add in a few points. The situation in pakistan will just get worse and worse over the next few weeks, and it's pretty much impossible to determine what will happen. The elections going on as planned could do something to diffuse the situation, although I have a feeling that it would end up causing more violence and unrest. There seems to be a recurring theme with highly disputed elections in countries which have hundreds of years of history ruled by dictatorial regimes. There's already too much unrest to hope for an entirely peacefull elections, and I can't help but expect that whoever did win would end up facing riots and massive unrest as soon as the results were announced.

On to the identity of Bhutto's murderers. The most common opinion seems to be that al-queda was responsible, and there have been reported transcripts of audio tapes where prominent al queda leaders praise each other for her murder, however, the tapes havent been released, and there is as yet no reliable hard evidence to support the claims that they are responsible.

~~Gates_of_Iscariot~~ · 12-28-2007, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crowquill

Lol what? Yes they are. Even if that were true I don't understand your logic, Al-Qaeda can't have committed it because they're a government but Israel could've because they're a what? Answer this for me, I know you can.

Somewhat they are, but not a much a sthe media likes to portray it.
Isreal is a bigger terror, infringing on palestine, and th likes, all i heard wa sthat it was possible Israeli militants may have been part of it

~~Gates_of_Iscariot~~ · 12-28-2007, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jibber

I'm not sure where to begin with the stupidity of that statement. Maybe with the "government" label. To be a government, they would actually have to have power over a country. Al-queda hasn't had control over afghanistan for a long time now. Actually, I'm not even going to bother continuing this explanation, that statement was just too retarded to waste any more time on.

I'll get on to the issue of the thread and add in a few points. The situation in pakistan will just get worse and worse over the next few weeks, and it's pretty much impossible to determine what will happen. The elections going on as planned could do something to diffuse the situation, although I have a feeling that it would end up causing more violence and unrest. There seems to be a recurring theme with highly disputed elections in countries which have hundreds of years of history ruled by dictatorial regimes. There's already too much unrest to hope for an entirely peacefull elections, and I can't help but expect that whoever did win would end up facing riots and massive unrest as soon as the results were announced.

On to the identity of Bhutto's murderers. The most common opinion seems to be that al-queda was responsible, and there have been reported transcripts of audio tapes where prominent al queda leaders praise each other for her murder, however, the tapes havent been released, and there is as yet no reliable hard evidence to support the claims that they are responsible.

Possibly but theres to much confusion to know for sure, about anything.
The whole areas a mess

The Us does nothing to help, they deter the situation, and alot of animosity comes from isreals hostility.

jibber · 12-28-2007, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gates_of_Iscariot

all i heard wa sthat it was possible Israeli militants may have been part of it

was that before or after the tooth fairy invited you to dinner?

seriously, you've done the work starting a discussion about this issue. now let people with an education share their thoughts and sit quietly and listen; you just might learn something.

jibber · 12-28-2007, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gates_of_Iscariot

Possibly but theres to much confusion to know for sure, about anything.
The whole areas a mess

The Us does nothing to help, they deter the situation, and alot of animosity comes from isreals hostility.

the US has implemented Musharrif as a puppet, I'd say they've done enough already. The most important thing for the US right now is to maybe, JUST MAYBE, learn from past mistakes. The US has a LONG history of invading a country under the guise of promoting stability, then leaving it broken and violent for the people to pick back up and saying "well we did all we could." Any foreign military power in pakistan right now would be an utter disaster. There's a huge militant islamic presence now, and a horrifyingly unstable government. Those militant islamic groups would be a whole lot more violent if another nation occupied the country. Sh*t = about to hit the fan and any military involvement by a foreign nation would be tantamount to adding dynamite to said sh*t.

~~Gates_of_Iscariot~~ · 12-28-2007, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jibber

was that before or after the tooth fairy invited you to dinner?

seriously, you've done the work starting a discussion about this issue. now let people with an education share their thoughts and sit quietly and listen; you just might learn something.

feck off
i have a bloody good education
just because you think everything true you see in the news.
I wont go into my academic achievements.
Not like they matter due to this country being flawed in their teaching practices.

Apparently
dissenting opinions are not allowed
brainwashed ****s
you think you're all so smart
Pfft no one ever looks at Isreal bec ause they are all butthurt over the holocaust

12-28-2007, 09:18 PM	#12 (permalink)
jibber Freeskier Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople... Posts: 1,536	^ do you have any information whatsoever to back up that claim? or is it another theory along the same lines as bush planned 9/11 and santa claus and the easter bunny are evil mascots thought up by the government designed and keep the world hooked on fatty foods laced with mind control hormones? __________________ What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road. William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass. HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER

12-28-2007, 10:26 PM	#15 (permalink)
jibber Freeskier Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople... Posts: 1,536	I'm not sure where to begin with the stupidity of that statement. Maybe with the "government" label. To be a government, they would actually have to have power over a country. Al-queda hasn't had control over afghanistan for a long time now. Actually, I'm not even going to bother continuing this explanation, that statement was just too retarded to waste any more time on. I'll get on to the issue of the thread and add in a few points. The situation in pakistan will just get worse and worse over the next few weeks, and it's pretty much impossible to determine what will happen. The elections going on as planned could do something to diffuse the situation, although I have a feeling that it would end up causing more violence and unrest. There seems to be a recurring theme with highly disputed elections in countries which have hundreds of years of history ruled by dictatorial regimes. There's already too much unrest to hope for an entirely peacefull elections, and I can't help but expect that whoever did win would end up facing riots and massive unrest as soon as the results were announced. On to the identity of Bhutto's murderers. The most common opinion seems to be that al-queda was responsible, and there have been reported transcripts of audio tapes where prominent al queda leaders praise each other for her murder, however, the tapes havent been released, and there is as yet no reliable hard evidence to support the claims that they are responsible. __________________ What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road. William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass. HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER

12-28-2007, 06:56 PM	#11 (permalink)
~~Gates_of_Iscariot~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: new hampshire Posts: 191	my opinion Isreal did it with musharaff because Bhutto was going to expose him and bush's connections with Israel and how Omar supposedly killed osama

12-28-2007, 10:14 PM	#13 (permalink)
~~Gates_of_Iscariot~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: new hampshire Posts: 191	al qaeda are not terrorists just an oppressive government ( denotes USS COLE >.>)