|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-14-2007, 02:57 AM | #51 (permalink) |
Bitchfarmer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Between the minarettes, down the Casbah way.
Posts: 983
|
The Sex-Beast for me, As long as she can hear.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Yup. Because I chose to play the fool in a six-piece band, First-night nerves every one-night stand. I should be glad to be so inclined. What a waste! What a waste! But I don't mind. |
03-14-2007, 05:51 PM | #52 (permalink) | |
Imperfectly Perfect
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,290
|
Quote:
I'm curious, what do you consider too young to be sexually active?
__________________
"it is only through a limitless accumulation of the imperfect that a certain type of perfection can be attained" |
|
03-14-2007, 06:04 PM | #53 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 468
|
I don't think anyone is too young to be sexually active, if everyone wore protection, but since they don't, I'd say they should wait 'til at least 16. Personally, I don't think people should be aloud to make babies though until they're 30. Then, almost everyone would be a good parent. Of course, I'm not really pro-abortion, so I don't know how to enforce that.
That kissing is sex thing came from an episode of Seinfeld, where they are discussing what should be considered sex. Someone says kissing is sex & Elaine says, 'kissing isn't sex, Jerry when would you say has sex taken place?' Jerry says, 'I woud say when the nipple makes its first appearnance.' Good stuff. I wouldn't consider kissing to be sex, but come on oral sex obviously is, it has sex in the name. |
03-14-2007, 06:11 PM | #54 (permalink) |
snickers
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: detroit
Posts: 2,194
|
Horrible argument.
Flaws: 1. Infants might wear protection 2. Just because you're 30 doesn't mean you're mature 3. Seinfeld's funny sometimes (that's not a flaw) 4. Just because sex is in the name doesn't mean it has to be considered sex.
__________________
A mi no me importa nada Para mi la vida es un sueño |
03-14-2007, 06:25 PM | #57 (permalink) | ||||
Account Disabled
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 468
|
Quote:
Edit: WTF? Last edited by TheUsedToolguy; 03-14-2007 at 07:59 PM. |
||||
03-14-2007, 07:46 PM | #58 (permalink) |
;)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 3,503
|
I'd go with the conversationalist. I think I'd get bored of having sex with the same person over and over again quicker than I'd get bored of talking to them. And, on the flip side, I think I'd get bored of talking to myself quicker than I'd get bored of jacking it.
|
03-14-2007, 07:51 PM | #59 (permalink) |
My home? Discabled,
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 204
|
Sexpalpls.
Regarding #4: Yes, you do. Because it's the biggest load of bible belt bull**** ever. When somebody says sex, they mean sexual intercourse. The act of putting a penis into a vagina, and jiggling it about a little. Is it an act of sex to be a transexual? No. Sexual activities and sex are not the same. Your implication is equivocal to me saying "all chocolate is sweet and thus all sweet things are chocolate". I mean, if you base your knowledge of activities purely on the words used to define them does that mean that a mans love for his rumpy pumpy pal is the same as the love for his child? No. BUT THEY HAS THE SAME WORD. Big deal.
__________________
Vita brevis, Occasio praeceps |
03-14-2007, 08:02 PM | #60 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 468
|
yeah right, oral sex is sex, anal sex is sex, vaginal intercourse is sex.
A hand job probably isn't sex, because it's not as intimate. How do I justify that? I don't know, but I don't agree with your philosophy that the only kind of sex is vaginal. |
|