It disturbs me greatly. :(

your attempts at indigence are just cute. It's like these two girls that I babysit occasionally, you remind me so much of them when they get angry.

Joy Im stopping now

Alright here's a topic
 

9/11 Government conspiracy?

My opinion on this is I'm not really sure, bcuz many say there weren't any Muslims on those planes, but haven't they been able to recover any dental records, at least of the one that crashed in PA, and prove whether or not this is true? If anyone knows plz tell me. Several bomb experts reviewed the devastation @ ground 0 and determined that it was a controlled demolition. As in when they knock down skyscrapers they implode it in a way as to not hurt the content of the landscape around them. So why didn't the buildings knock down any others around them? Why would our government want to knock over the World Trade Centers? Well we all know it made good war propaganda. I'm not saying it happened, but it does make u wonder w/ the fact that people suspected Bush would go to war in Iraq even before 9/11 ever happened, and then bush made the false allegation that there was a connection between Sadam & Al Qaeda. I'm perplexed myself. If Bush really did know about 9/11, he does hav one heck of a poker face.

And yet you still came in here and posted.

You know, as a political junkie I really hate how the non-junkies always feel the need to go "I hate politics can we talk about anything else" and then the 12 other lemmings in ear shot all go "yeah" and talk about the most low-brow conversation possible. Its infuriating. Part of me wishes that the political mongrels would unify and force you all to know currents events or be lashed, but then the other half knows when left to your own devices you'd vote for people based on the color of their tie. I'm telling you, when I reinstate facism in the U.S. (and real facism, but this "bush is hitler" ****) I'm going to take out the ignorant cow-polk zombies once and for all. Read books or be erradicated. How's that for a literacy rate. /is drunk.

And Lincoln freed the slaves for political reasons because he realized that trying to reason with the Southerners was useless and he stopped compramising and said "well we're going to take your **** then you whiney petulant drawl-bags." lincoln was gangsta like that.

And Nixon was great as a policy man, and untouchable as a diplomat, I don't think he was as bad as he seemed at the time.

On a side note, I hope the Klaxons side in a fiery bus crash.

But calling lincoln bad is simply foolish.

^ One of the finest posts ever.
A classic MusicBanter moment from the Big3.

Just watch Farenheit 911...

Most of your post is pure magic. But the one thing I disagree with is your rant on people who aren't political junkies. I'm an extremely cynical person meaning politics depress me to no end and I don't seek out to talk about something depressing. But that doesn't mean I, or other people who aren't political junkies, want to talk about some low-brow issue. It's not fair to label all the non-political junkies by the ignorant opinions and childish phrases and attitudes of Skindredluvr. Personally i'm a big Philosophy and Psychology person, and would greatly prefer to discuss something like that, because I know that I have much more control over my theories than I will ever have over the government.

Other than that I agree with the political stance you take in your post.

But in most peoples experiences..what he described is what happens...its not just limited to Politics..it can be religion or abortion or any seriously debatable topic...even Philosophy which really isnt a debate more a topic under which debate can fall under...

yes, i agree. I'm just going for preference of what I prefer to debate, example I would much rather discuss if abortion should be allowed or not, than the political policies of a dead guy.