|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-23-2006, 12:36 AM | #83 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 44
|
What makes Michael Richards different from people that "actually are racist"?
Who says Michael Richards isn't "actually racist". I think that a guy using tons of racial epithets and references to lynching towards a black man is a pretty clear sign of racism. |
11-23-2006, 12:49 AM | #84 (permalink) | ||
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
|
Quote:
Quote:
And thats why i`m saying it`s a load of rubbish.
__________________
Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
||
11-23-2006, 12:51 AM | #85 (permalink) | |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 44
|
A black guy would not call another black in an argument a "******" in an attempt to belittle him.
You saying you have heard it happen is bullsh*t and I do not believe you. THAT is why I am saying your argument is "rubbish" In the situation that a black man would call another black a ****** in an argument it would once again be in the same sense that he may use dude, man, or in your case "mate" "chap" or "lad" which white people also use in arguments. Quote:
Last edited by RHYMEFESTkillah; 11-23-2006 at 12:59 AM. |
|
11-23-2006, 12:59 AM | #86 (permalink) | |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
|
Quote:
Why wouldn`t they use it? Because it has racist connections which was my original point.
__________________
Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
|
11-23-2006, 01:02 AM | #87 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 44
|
The word "******" when used in contempt of another DOES have racist connections.
When used synonomously with "man" or "dude" it DOES NOT have racist connections. A black person wouldn't use it in an attempt to belittle another black person simply because the word, (in a racial matter) is a blanket term for black people, which he would be. In saying it to belittle another he would belittle himself. A situation like that would never arise which is why there is no need to decide whether or not it would be racism. It would never happen. |
11-23-2006, 01:08 AM | #88 (permalink) | |
Account Disabled
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,174
|
Quote:
|
|
|