Seltzer |
05-31-2010 01:21 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freebase Dali
(Post 873790)
Social networking sites aren't the problem.
The people that use them irresponsibly are.
|
I agree with this - Facebook now provides comprehensive fine-grained privacy settings and it's down to the user to set these appropriately. One problem is that there is still a bit of subtlety as to how fb works; e.g. the visibility of your posts on another person's wall is affected by the privacy settings for both people... presumably fb reverts to whichever is more restrictive. Either way, fb handles it much better than it used to.
I've always been a bit blithe about my personal privacy on the net and I've only just recently started tightening it after having to deal with a stalker (this isn't the first time either). And there's the whole potential employability thing too.
It is possible to have a completely anonymous facebook profile but there's no point in this if your security between social networks is flawed. I think the concept of rings in computer security is useful here - the idea being that inner rings are more privileged and access to them from outer rings is controlled. For me, the inner ring consists of MSN, facebook and Bebo (even though I don't use it anymore), the next ring is forums and the outer ring is other sites like last.fm. This means that since FB and MSN are in the same ring, I don't mind if people on my msn add me on facebook, hence I use the same e-mail address for both and allow people to find me on fb by importing their msn contacts. It also means that I don't tend to add MBers on fb/msn unless I know them relatively well (my fb/msn is mainly for people I know IRL). Like I said, I've only started taking this stuff seriously lately and it's not yet all in place. E.g. the fact that I'm a member of the MB group on last.fm breaches the above ideals.
|