Tyson vs. Shamrock (quote, '95) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-18-2006, 07:52 AM   #7 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oojay View Post
who would win in a fight? Mike Tyson in his prime ('88-'92) or Ken Shamrock ('93-'95)?


after thinking it over, id probably put my money on shamrock, even though tyson could take his head off with one punch, ken is a shoot fighter and could most likely take tyson down easily and submit him.
Take Tyson down easily?!?!Hell, he probally couldn't do much to Tyson even now. In Tyson's prime he could and would "kill" everybody he came in contact with.Shamrock wouldn't stand a chance against him, period.If Shamrock, in some of your guys' opinions, could take down Tyson, why wasn't he ever able to even contend with him?Do you love Shamrock that much or are trying to promote a fight for him or something?Tyson beats Shamrock anyday!I'd put Big Money on that one.
Wild7Dustr is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.