|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-05-2006, 07:49 AM | #1331 (permalink) | |
My home? Discabled,
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 204
|
Quote:
__________________
Vita brevis, Occasio praeceps |
|
06-05-2006, 08:13 AM | #1332 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sussex, UK
Posts: 90
|
There seems to be a heck of a lot of confusion here, especially regarding scientific fact/theory.
Lets start with the first one, gravity. Contrary to popular belief, Newtons theory of gravitation was disproven (or more accurately, extended) by Einstein's Theory of General Relativity. Newton stated that two masses attract (and to all intents and purposes they do). The problem comes when you see that light is bent by gravity, Einstein managed to explain this. Secondly, the existence of atoms (protons, neutrons and electrons) was proven a long time ago. In fact, the existence of other particles has already been proven (photons, bosons, quarks etc). The only so called "messenger particle" we have yet to detect is the one responsible for gravitation. This is no surprise, since gravity is the weakest force of them all. Thirdly, Scientists can accurately model the universe from its present state, back to the first few nanoseconds of the universe. Here, things start to get very strange (in the same way that physics inside a black hole do not work). Fourthly, evolution is a proven fact, you can even demonstrate it in your own home. What has yet to be proven, is how our decendants arrived here, for which there are many theories. Finally, creationism is flawed from the start (certainly the bibles version of). In fact, most Christians would accept that Genesis is just a representation of "facts unknown". Just like every book, it needs a starting point. With the level of knowledge available at the time, creationism seemed like the logical answer. Dave |
06-05-2006, 08:21 AM | #1333 (permalink) | |||
Thrice
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 62
|
Quote:
Quote:
far out, it is impossible to debate with someone, when they cant admit what is blatantly obvious. Go ask any credible scientist if evolution is proven fact. My god, people, i now remember why i left these boards.
__________________
Quote:
The Earth Will Shake Music Banter Dream Team Members Are Ghey my band=www.myspace.com/wingsofthefallen |
|||
06-05-2006, 09:22 AM | #1334 (permalink) | |
My home? Discabled,
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 204
|
Quote:
__________________
Vita brevis, Occasio praeceps |
|
06-05-2006, 11:43 AM | #1336 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sussex, UK
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
You can even prove the theory of evolution in your own home. Farmers use the theory everyday. Those who "create" new species of flowers use the same principal. The theory itself is sound. The mechanics of it (the hows so to speak) are still a work in progress, but only to the same extent that the theory of gravity is a work in progress. The problem you find with creationism, is that it requires a giant leap of faith. The more we find out about the way the universe works, the more evidence we have disproving creationism (particularly as depicted in the bible). The theory, that an omnipotent being created everything, is a valid theory, but only when taken out of the bounds of religion (Adam and Eve), and into the realms of science (discussing the level of 'design' that surrounds us). However, that indication of design in no way proves the creationism theory. It can equally well be applied to the theory of evolution. Creationism has not a single bit of evidence that would suggest it to be true. There is plenty of evidence that suggests evolution, or a similar concept thereof, to be a valid theory describing our origins. The difference between the two sides of the argument is plain to see. We have one group who require evidence, logic and science before something is accepted as fact. We have the other group who are willing to make a leap of faith, who simply "believe" things to be true. One final point. Somone mention the odds of us being here (something about a tornado through a junk yard creating an airplane). It is estimated there is something of the order of 10^22 stars in the universe (10000000000000000000000). Surely it is highly unlikely we are the only life giving planet! Surely the right circumstances to support life just happened to occur more than once, with all those tries to get it right? When people quote statistics regarding the likelyhood of something occuring in the universe, they seem to forget the sheer size of the universe. Dave |
|
06-05-2006, 12:47 PM | #1337 (permalink) |
;)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 3,503
|
What the hell kind of God would create .... us? We're an infestation of ignorant assholes polluting the planet with our filth and bad taste in music.
I'm surprised he hasn't tried to flood us again. Or maybe he killed himself. |
06-05-2006, 12:51 PM | #1338 (permalink) |
butt say x
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: so i read the question as "Where YOU live" which was kinda funny instead of "Where you live"
Posts: 1,649
|
I still haven't seen one of those heart-felt stupids. I'm waiting guys. Who ever does it I'll send them my porn collection (and I've got a lot). So lets get the stupids rolling.
__________________
Can I have a youtube video for a sig? There's a thing that says "Wrap [YOUTUBE] tags around selected text" |
06-05-2006, 01:08 PM | #1339 (permalink) | ||
Account Disabled
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hot-lanta
Posts: 3,140
|
Quote:
You tell us it is blatantly obvious that evolution is not proven fact? Let me quote National Geographic November 2004, written by David Quammen: Was Darwin Wrong? Quote:
|
||
06-05-2006, 01:52 PM | #1340 (permalink) | |
Atchin' Akai
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Unamerica
Posts: 8,723
|
Quote:
|
|
|