![]() |
Phil Keaggy
For a guy with about 50 albums to his credit, he doesn´t get mentioned much on MB, so as a service to our community here´s a beginners´ guide to Phil Keaggy:-
> alive, American, plays the guitar. > equally impressive on elec or acoustic. > founder member of Glass Harp, who performed some pioneering rock jams in the seventies > likes to mention Jesus in almost every lyric he writes > is surrounded by rumours that this conversation once took place: ............................Interviewer: So, Jimi/Eric/Eddie, what does it feel like to be the world´s greatest living guitarist ? .....Hendrix/Clapton/van Hallen: I don´t know. You´ll have to ask Phil Keaggy. > his best selling album, The Master and the Musician, goes something like this:- > yes, he is missing half a finger > at the other extreme of his repertoire, he can play like this too :- |
Amazing picker. Needs to STFU about Jesus.
|
Quote:
|
He's not mentioned because of his faith. No matter how good you are at something, if you're a Christian, you get panned. That's now, of course. In the past it was a different matter.
|
Quote:
Phil makes me want to burn my guitars. He's so damn good. |
Quote:
I imagine that in some arts, Christianity is ok, but somehow it doesn´t sit well with rock and blues. Well, they were famously described as the Devil´s music, weren´t they? And although we may not want to hear lyrics direct from the Devil himself, rock is the music of rebellion, so we want some kind of subversive attitude and preferably a stage presence of strutting priapic menace. Poor old Phil K lets us down on both counts. Quote:
|
People complaining that he needs to STFU about Jesus is bullshit. (1) No one tells other artists who sing about a particular topic--like love--to STFU. (2) He may sing about whatever the fuck he wants to.
|
Quote:
In answer to your other points:- Quote:
Quote:
|
Absolutely. One may criticize all he wants, but I still call bullshit on criticizing one artist for certain beliefs but not criticizing others for other beliefs simply because one happens to believe in the beliefs of the latter. The music should be taken for what it is, not criticized through the agendas of listeners that have nothing to do with music. If it's good, it's good, regardless of religion.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:23 PM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.