Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Introductions (https://www.musicbanter.com/introductions/)
-   -   Member Picture Gallery (https://www.musicbanter.com/introductions/87-member-picture-gallery.html)

Key 11-29-2016 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1775427)
What's done is done.

Fair enough. But I don't really see why lounge posts should be a reason for a ban. It's the lounge. There's a reason it's near the bottom of the forum home page.

Key 11-29-2016 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1775427)
Hindsight advice is also not considered to be very helpful, either.

I modded a forum for several years. I know what the job entails. I'm just trying to offer some insight.

Though to my own credit, I did go on powertrips too. But I learned to walk past it in the end.

DwnWthVwls 11-29-2016 09:22 PM

Plot twist: Chula is JWB and Frownland is Plankton.

Black Francis 11-29-2016 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls (Post 1775433)
Plot twist: Chula is JWB and Frownland is Plankton.

Yea, it was basically the same sh*t. MB is cursed by the defiant spirit of JWB.

Frownland 11-29-2016 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ki (Post 1775430)
Fair enough. But I don't really see why lounge posts should be a reason for a ban. It's the lounge. There's a reason it's near the bottom of the forum home page.

Rules apply to all parts of a forum.

This wasn't personal. If another member told me to **** off when I asked them to follow a rule (posting pictures of members, not just any photo that members might have), were warned about needlessly insulting people and reminded to follow the rules, then came back and said (basically) "no, **** off" and added a "ban me then," they would get the exact same treatment.

Now quit. ****ing. Whining. About. Every. Goddamned. Thing. Remember when people thought you contributed positively to the forum?

Key 11-29-2016 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1775437)
Rules apply to all parts of a forum.

This wasn't personal. If another member told me to **** off when I asked them to follow a rule (posting pictures of members, not just any photo that members might have), were warned about needlessly insulting people and reminded to follow the rules, then came back and said (basically) "no, **** off" and added a "ban me then," they would get the exact same treatment.

Quit being so ****ing whiny already now.

Nah, the rules only apply when you feel they apply. It's never been that way in the lounge, as far as I can remember. It's meant to be lenient here, unless there is really offensive warranting a ban. Which again, prompts me to say that you could have simply PM'd Chula, instead of making it public.

There have been several instances that were ban worthy at this foruma nd you sat back and joined in instead of being a mod. Don't suddenly come to save the day as if you're a man in shining armor.

Frownland 11-29-2016 09:30 PM

I'm probably a lot more strict than you realize. I usually don't even ask.

As far as your advice goes, could I borrow your time machine?

bulbasaur 11-29-2016 09:30 PM

i wonder what the reformed chula will be like

DwnWthVwls 11-29-2016 09:31 PM

As an objective on looker i think if any other mod ban him it wouldnt have caused such drama. You two have a history of ****ting on each other and i think ur smart enough to understand how some people could view this as abuse of authority even if it was not ur intent.

Frownland 11-29-2016 09:31 PM

I recognize that, it's why I tried to address it earlier by posting basically what I just told Ki.

Maybe Ki's dumb argument will help Chula be on my side for once!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.