Is Indie consumerist bullsh*t? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Indie & Alternative
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-03-2023, 11:00 AM   #1 (permalink)
killedmyraindog
 
TheBig3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,246
Default

I always think the harbinger of a genre isn't the problem, it's the shills they get to do the same sound with less morals or principles.
  • Nirvana has principles but Three Days Grace doesn't
  • The White Stripes has principles but Rilo Kiley doesn't
  • RATM has principles but Limp Bizkit doesn't

Again I think lumping The Stripes in with Death Cab, the Lumineers, and Sonic Youth feels a bit absurd. Maybe in 2002 it was fine. But now we need subgenres.

But his point about it not standing for anything, and catering to bored Midwesterners is an angle I've never really thought about. I was hardcore into Indie rock and to some extent other forms of indie bands.

Also his argument that Husker Du is an edgier REM was priceless.
TheBig3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.